ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2016
Moving-source elastic wave reconstruction for high-resolution optical coherence elastography.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phantoms for use in optical coherence elastography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Review
- Two-dimensional (2D) dynamic vibration optical coherence elastography (DV-OCE) for evaluating mechanical properties: a potential application in tissue engineering.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Multimodal quantitative optical elastography of the crystalline lens with optical coherence elastography and Brillouin microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Assessing the biomechanical properties of the porcine crystalline lens as a function of intraocular pressure with optical coherence elastography.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based elasticity imaging can map soft tissue elasticity based on speckle-tracking of elastic wave propagation using highly sensitive phase measurements of OCT signals. Using a fixed elastic wave source and moving detection, current imaging sequences have difficulty in reconstructing tissue elasticity within speckle-free regions, for example, within the crystalline lens of the eye. We present a moving acoustic radiation force imaging sequence to reconstruct elastic properties within a speckle-free region by tracking elastic wave propagation from multiple laterally moving sources across the field of view. We demonstrate the proposed strategy using heterogeneous and partial speckle-free tissue-mimicking phantoms. Harder inclusions within the speckle-free region can be detected, and the contrast-to-noise ratio slightly enhanced compared to current OCE imaging sequences. The results suggest that a moving source approach may be appropriate for OCE studies within the large speckle-free regions of the crystalline lens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.