Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822569›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2016

Trends in Research with U.S. Military Service Member Participants: A Population-Specific ClinicalTrials.gov Review.

Wendy A Cook, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Elizabeth J Bridges

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02518893 (Health Research Participation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02518893 unknown statusnot on this map

Health Research Participation: Experiences and Decisions of Military Members

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2015 to 2018Enrolled50ConditionsDecision Making, Life ExperiencesArmsDemographic Data, Interview
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wendy A CookBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, Box 357266, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 98195, wacook@uw.edu.
Ardith Z DoorenbosBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, Box 357266, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 98195, doorenbo@uw.edu.
Elizabeth J BridgesBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, Box 357266, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA 98195, ebridges@uw.edu.

Funding

Applying Technology to Problems in Pain and Symptom ManagementK24NR015340 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOORENBOS, ARDITH Z · 2014 to 2018
$842k
NINR NIH HHS K24 NR015340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinicalTrials.gov reviews have evaluated research trends for specific conditions and age groups but not for specific populations of research participants. No ClinicalTrials.gov reviews have evaluated research with military service member participants. PURPOSE: Study objectives were (a) to use ClinicalTrials.gov to identify trends in biomedical research from 2005 to 2014 in which U.S. military service members actively participated as research participants and (b) to describe a search strategy for adaptation in future ClinicalTrials.gov reviews of specific participant populations.

methodsA systematic review of ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify studies that included U.S. service members as participants, either exclusively or with other groups of participants.

resultsU.S. service members were identified as participants in 512 studies. Service members participated together with other groups in 392 studies, while 120 studies included only service members. The top five conditions of interest were post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, amputations, burns, and ocular injuries/disorders. The number of studies started each year peaked in 2011 and declined from 2012 to 2014. Twenty-five percent of studies exclusive to service members aimed to enroll 500 or more participants. Research exclusive to Guard and Reserve service members during this period was limited.

conclusionsU.S. military service members participate in biomedical research. To address the health needs of U.S. service members, it is important to ensure there is not a prolonged decline in research among this population. The search strategy may be adapted to ClinicalTrials.gov reviews of specific participant populations for which straightforward searches are not possible.

Indexed as

active dutyNational Guardpost-traumatic stress disorderresearch participationtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID27822569
PMCPMC5096463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.