Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822565›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2016

Teleconsent: A Novel Approach to Obtain Informed Consent for Research.

Brandon M Welch, Elizabeth Marshall, Suparna Qanungo, Ayesha Aziz, Marilyn Laken, Leslie Lenert, Jihad Obeid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Medical researchersZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Narrative review of telemedicine applications in decentralized research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Decentralised clinical trials in multiple sclerosis research.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. FORUM: Remote testing for psychological and physiological acoustics.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brandon M WelchBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St, Suite 405, Charleston, SC 29425.
Elizabeth MarshallBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St, Suite 405, Charleston, SC 29425.
Suparna QanungoCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, 99 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC 29425.
Ayesha AzizBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St, Suite 405, Charleston, SC 29425.
Marilyn LakenCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, 99 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC 29425.
Leslie LenertBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St, Suite 405, Charleston, SC 29425.
Jihad ObeidBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Cannon St, Suite 405, Charleston, SC 29425.

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of recruitment of qualified research participants continues to be a significant bottleneck in clinical trials, often resulting in costly time extensions, underpowered results, and in some cases early termination. Some of the reasons for suboptimal recruitment include laborious consent processes and access to participants at remote locations. While new electronic consents technologies (eConsent) help overcome challenges related to readability and consent management, they do not adequately address challenges related to remote access. To address this, we have developed an innovative solution called "teleconsent", which embeds the informed consent process into a telemedicine session. Teleconsent allows a researcher to remotely video conference with a prospective research participant, display and interactively guide participants in real-time through a consent form. When finished, the researcher and participant can electronically sign the consent form and print or download the signed document for archiving. This process can eliminate challenges related to travel and management of personnel at remote sites. Teleconsent has been successfully implemented in several clinical trials. Teleconsent can improve research recruitment by reducing the barriers related to informed consent, while preserving human interaction.

Indexed as

clinical researchclinical trialsInformed consenttelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID27822565
PMCPMC5096381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.