Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822506›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Striatal Activity and Reward Relativity: Neural Signals Encoding Dynamic Outcome Valuation.

Emily S Webber, David E Mankin, Howard C Cromwell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily S WebberDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403; J.P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind & Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403.
David E MankinDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403; J.P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind & Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403.
Howard C CromwellDepartment of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403; J.P. Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind & Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403.ORCID 0000-0003-0464-7082

Funding

Basal ganglia and relative reward effectR15MH091016 · NIMH · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROMWELL, HOWARD CASEY · 2010 to 2010
$412k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH091016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The striatum is a key brain region involved in reward processing. Striatal activity has been linked to encoding reward magnitude and integrating diverse reward outcome information. Recent work has supported the involvement of striatum in the valuation of outcomes. The present work extends this idea by examining striatal activity during dynamic shifts in value that include different levels and directions of magnitude disparity. A novel task was used to produce diverse relative reward effects on a chain of instrumental action. Rats (

Indexed as

RewardAction PotentialsAnimalsConditioning, OperantCorpus StriatumDiscrimination, PsychologicalEatingElectrodes, ImplantedFoodGeneralization, PsychologicalMaleNasal Provocation TestsNeuronsRats, Sprague-DawleyTime Factorselectrophysiologygoal-directed actionincentive contrastmotivationnucleus accumbenssingle unit recording

Identifiers

PMID27822506
PMCPMC5089537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.