Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822342›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of stem cells2016

Characterization and genetic manipulation of primed stem cells into a functional naïve state with

Ricardo Antonio Rossello, Andreas Pfenning, Jason T Howard, Ute Hochgeschwender

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of stem cells, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo Antonio RosselloRicardo Antonio Rossello, Department of Science and Technology, Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, Metropolitan University, San Juan 00928, Puerto Rico.
Andreas PfenningRicardo Antonio Rossello, Department of Science and Technology, Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, Metropolitan University, San Juan 00928, Puerto Rico.
Jason T HowardRicardo Antonio Rossello, Department of Science and Technology, Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, Metropolitan University, San Juan 00928, Puerto Rico.
Ute HochgeschwenderRicardo Antonio Rossello, Department of Science and Technology, Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, Metropolitan University, San Juan 00928, Puerto Rico.
Ana G. Mendez University System · PRDuke University Hospital · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversidad Metropolitana · PR

Funding

Project 2 - neurotransgenic core - Neuroscience Infrastructure at Duke UniversityP30NS061789 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2008 to 2013
$3.4M
Training in Fundamental &Translational NeuroscienceT32NS051156 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCNAMARA, JAMES O. · 2005 to 2014
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS061789NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS051156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify differences between primed mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and fully functional naive ESCs; to manipulate primed cells into a naive state.

methodsWe have cultured 3 lines of cells from different mouse strains that have been shown to be naive or primed as determined by generating germline-transmitting chimeras. Cells were put through a battery of tests to measure the different features. RNA from cells was analyzed using microarrays, to determine a priority list of the differentially expressed genes. These were later validated by quantificational real-time polymerase chain reaction. Viral cassettes were created to induce expression of differentially expressed genes in the primed cells through lentiviral transduction. Primed reprogrammed cells were subjected to

resultsMost results show that both primed and naive cells have similar features (morphology, proliferation rates, stem cell genes expressed). However, there were some genes that were differentially expressed in the naïve cells relative to the primed cells. Key upregulated genes in naïve cells include

conclusionAlthough there are no notable phenotypic differences, there are key differences in gene expression between these naïve and primed stem cells. These differences can be overcome through overexpression.

Indexed as

C-mycERASESRRBInduced stem cellsOverexpression

Identifiers

PMID27822342
PMCPMC5080642
OpenAlexW2538271818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.