Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822319›Full record

Trial reportClinical epigenetics2016

Effect of prenatal DHA supplementation on the infant epigenome: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Susan J van Dijk, Jing Zhou, Timothy J Peters, Michael Buckley, Brodie Sutcliffe, Yalchin Oytam, Robert A Gibson, Andrew McPhee, Lisa N Yelland, Maria Makrides and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical epigenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Omega-3 fatty acid addition during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Maternal fatty acid concentrations and newborn DNA methylation.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Susan J van DijkCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, PO Box 52, North Ryde, New South Wales 1670 Australia.
Jing ZhouFOODplus Research Centre, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5064 Australia.
Timothy J PetersCSIRO Data61, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113 Australia.
Michael BuckleyCSIRO Data61, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113 Australia.
Brodie SutcliffeCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, PO Box 52, North Ryde, New South Wales 1670 Australia.
Yalchin OytamCSIRO Agriculture and Food, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113 Australia.
Robert A GibsonFOODplus Research Centre, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5064 Australia ; Child Nutrition Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5006 Australia.
Andrew McPheeDepartment of Neonatal Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia 5006 Australia.
Lisa N YellandChild Nutrition Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5006 Australia ; School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000 Australia.
Maria MakridesChild Nutrition Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5006 Australia.
Peter L MolloyCSIRO Health and Biosecurity, PO Box 52, North Ryde, New South Wales 1670 Australia.
Beverly S MuhlhauslerFOODplus Research Centre, School of Agriculture Food and Wine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5064 Australia ; Child Nutrition Research Centre, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5006 Australia.
CSIRO Health and Biosecurity · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUData61 · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence is accumulating that nutritional exposures in utero can influence health outcomes in later life. Animal studies and human epidemiological studies have implicated epigenetic modifications as playing a key role in this process, but there are limited data from large well-controlled human intervention trials. This study utilized a large double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial to test whether a defined nutritional exposure in utero, in this case docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), could alter the infant epigenome. Pregnant mothers consumed DHA-rich fish oil (800 mg DHA/day) or placebo supplements from 20 weeks' gestation to delivery. Blood spots were collected from the children at birth (

resultsThere were no differences in global DNA methylation levels between the DHA and control group either at birth or at 5 years, but we identified 21 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) at birth, showing small DNA methylation differences (<5%) between the treatment groups, some of which seemed to persist until 5 years. The number of DMRs at birth was greater in males (127 DMRs) and in females (72 DMRs) separately, indicating a gender-specific effect.

conclusionMaternal DHA supplementation during the second half of pregnancy had small effects on DNA methylation of infants. While the potential functional significance of these changes remains to be determined, these findings further support the role of epigenetic modifications in developmental programming in humans and point the way for future studies.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12605000569606 and ACTRN12611001127998.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolDietary SupplementsDNA MethylationDocosahexaenoic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFetal BloodHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNew ZealandPregnancyPrenatal CarePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsDocosahexaenoic AcidsChildrenDNA methylationEpigeneticsFatty acidsPregnancyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID27822319
PMCPMC5096291
OpenAlexW2548649412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.