Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822224›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2016

Nutritional Influence on Epigenetic Marks and Effect on Livestock Production.

Brenda M Murdoch, Gordon K Murdoch, Sabrina Greenwood, Stephanie McKay

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Transgenerational Impact of Environmental Change.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. How Does Nutrition Affect the Epigenetic Changes in Dairy Cows?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Examining the extent of environmental contributions toward DNA methylation and phenotypic variation.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021
    Article
  14. How Does Protein Nutrition Affect the Epigenetic Changes in Pig? A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brenda M MurdochDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow ID, USA.
Gordon K MurdochDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow ID, USA.
Sabrina GreenwoodDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington VT, USA.
Stephanie McKayDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington VT, USA.
University of Idaho · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrition represents one of the greatest environmental determinants of an individual's health. While nutrient quantity and quality impart direct effects, the interaction of nutrition with genetic and epigenetic modifications is often overlooked despite being shown to influence biological variation in mammals. Dissecting complex traits, such as those that are diet or nutrition related, to determine the genetic and epigenetic contributions toward a phenotype can be a formidable process. Epigenetic modifications add another layer of complexity as they do not change the DNA sequence itself but can affect transcription and are important mediators of gene expression and ensuing phenotypic variation. Altered carbohydrate metabolism and rates of fat and protein deposition resulting from diet-induced hypo- or hyper-methylation highlight the capability of nutritional epigenetics to influence livestock commodity quality and quantity. This interaction can yield either products tailored to consumer preference, such as marbling in meat cuts, or potentially increasing productivity and yield both in terms of carcass yield and/or offspring performance. Understanding how these and other desirable phenotypes result from epigenetic mechanisms will facilitate their inducible potential in livestock systems. Here, we discuss the establishment of the epigenome, examples of nutritional mediated alterations of epigenetics and epigenetic effects on livestock production.

Indexed as

epigeneticslivestockmethylationnutrientsnutritional epigenetics

Identifiers

PMID27822224
PMCPMC5075561
OpenAlexW2533014619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.