Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822106›Full record

ReviewClinical epidemiology2016

The Danish National Database for Asthma.

Vibeke Backer, Jesper Lykkegaard, Uffe Bodtger, Lone Agertoft, Lene Korshoej, Elvira Vaclavik Braüner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trends in childhood asthma in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. COVID-19 and Long-term Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Asthma.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Determinants of airflow limitation in Danish adults - findings from the Health2006 cohort.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vibeke BackerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine L, Bispebjerg Frederiskberg University Hospital, Copenhagen.
Jesper LykkegaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.
Uffe BodtgerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Næstved Hospital, Næstved; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark.
Lone AgertoftHans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense.
Lene KorshoejCompetence Centre for Clinical Quality and Information Technology West (KCKS West), Aarhus.
Elvira Vaclavik BraünerResearch Center for Prevention and Health, Center for Health, Glostrup Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Glostrup; Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the databaseAsthma is the most prevalent chronic disease in children, adolescents, and young adults. In Denmark (with a population of 5.6 million citizens), >400,000 persons are prescribed antiasthmatic medication annually. However, undiagnosed cases, dubious diagnoses, and poor asthma management are probably common. The Danish National Database for Asthma (DNDA) was established in 2015. The aim of the DNDA was to collect the data on all patients treated for asthma in Denmark and to monitor asthma occurrence, the quality of diagnosis, and management. STUDY POPULATION: Persons above the age of 6 years, with a specific focus on 6-44 years, are included. The DNDA links three existing nationwide registries of administrative records in the Danish health care system: the National Patient Register, the National Health Insurance Services Register, and the National Prescription Registry. For each year, the inclusion criteria are a second purchase of asthma prescription medicine within a 2-year period (National Prescription Registry) or a diagnosis of asthma (National Patient Register). Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are excluded, but smokers are not excluded. DESCRIPTIVE DATA: A total of 366,471 prevalent patients with asthma have been identified (year 2014 - as a preliminary test search). This number is in agreement with the estimates of ~400,000 inhabitants that are available for patients with possible asthma in Denmark. Data encompass the following quality indicators: annual asthma control visits and pharmacological therapy. MAIN VARIABLES: The variables included are spirometry, as well as tools for diagnosis (including allergy testing), smoking status, height, weight, and acute hospital admissions and unscheduled visits.

conclusionDNDA is available from January 1, 2016.

Indexed as

asthma controlasthma managementhospital dataindicatorprescription data

Identifiers

PMID27822106
PMCPMC5094569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.