Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27822097›Full record

ReviewClinical epidemiology2016

The Danish Melanoma Database.

Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich, Siri Klausen, Eva Spaun, Grethe Schmidt, Dorte Gad, Inge Marie Svane, Henrik Schmidt, Henrik Frank Lorentzen, Else Helene Ibfelt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisbet Rosenkrantz HölmichDepartment of Plastic Surgery.
Siri KlausenDepartment of Pathology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev.
Eva SpaunInstitute of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
Grethe SchmidtDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Breast Surgery and Burns, Rigshospitalet - Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
Dorte GadDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense.
Inge Marie SvaneCenter for Cancer Immune Therapy, Department of Hematology; Department of Oncology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev.
Henrik SchmidtDepartment of Oncology.
Henrik Frank LorentzenDepartment of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus.
Else Helene IbfeltRegistry Support Centre (East) - Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup - Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of databaseThe aim of the database is to monitor and improve the treatment and survival of melanoma patients. STUDY POPULATION: All Danish patients with cutaneous melanoma and in situ melanomas must be registered in the Danish Melanoma Database (DMD). In 2014, 2,525 patients with invasive melanoma and 780 with in situ tumors were registered. The coverage is currently 93% compared with the Danish Pathology Register. MAIN VARIABLES: The main variables include demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics, including Breslow's tumor thickness, ± ulceration, mitoses, and tumor-node-metastasis stage. Information about the date of diagnosis, treatment, type of surgery, including safety margins, results of lymphoscintigraphy in patients for whom this was indicated (tumors > T1a), results of sentinel node biopsy, pathological evaluation hereof, and follow-up information, including recurrence, nature, and treatment hereof is registered. In case of death, the cause and date are included. Currently, all data are entered manually; however, data catchment from the existing registries is planned to be included shortly. DESCRIPTIVE DATA: The DMD is an old research database, but new as a clinical quality register. The coverage is high, and the performance in the five Danish regions is quite similar due to strong adherence to guidelines provided by the Danish Melanoma Group. The list of monitored indicators is constantly expanding, and annual quality reports are issued. Several important scientific studies are based on DMD data.

conclusionDMD holds unique detailed information about tumor characteristics, the surgical treatment, and follow-up of Danish melanoma patients. Registration and monitoring is currently expanding to encompass even more clinical parameters to benefit both patient treatment and research.

Indexed as

clinical databaseDenmarkmalignant melanomamelanomamelanoma registryquality database

Identifiers

PMID27822097
PMCPMC5094525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.