ReviewClinical epidemiology2016
The Danish Heart Registry.
Review in Clinical epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Characteristics and Quality of National Cardiac Registries: A Systematic Review.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2021Pooled it
- Factors influencing harmonized health data collection, sharing and linkage in Denmark and Switzerland: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Clinical outcomes of no stenting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing deferred primary percutaneous coronary intervention.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Trial
- Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement: Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between the David and Yacoub Procedure in Denmark.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a neural network survival prediction model for ischemic heart disease.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- The use of healthcare contacts following a first diagnosis of chest pain among women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the WOMANOCA nationwide cohort study.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Article
- Aortic valve-sparing root replacement and composite root replacement: a Danish multicentre nationwide study.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- Aortic Root Replacement Procedures: A Validation Study of the Western Denmark Heart Registry from 1999 to 2022.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Long-term prognostic impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist before ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Observational
- Predictors of Hospital Readmission After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting - Reflections and Perspectives.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2025Article
- Temporal changes in characteristics, incidence, and mortality in patients undergoing surgical intervention for mitral stenosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Time From Distress Call to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Geographical inequalities in the decreasing 28-day mortality following incident acute myocardial infarction: a Danish register-based cohort study, 1987-2016.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Social and emotional factors as predictors of poor outcomes following cardiac surgery.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- Optimal Medical Therapy Prescription in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Netherlands: A Multicenter Pilot Registry.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2021Article
- Chronic post-operative opioid use after open cardiac surgery: A Danish population-based cohort study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2021Article
- Importance of acute cardiac care registries at the national level.Acta clinica Croatica · 2020Article
- The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Review
- Benchmarking Danish hospitals on mortality and readmission rates after cardiovascular admission.Clinical epidemiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe Danish Heart Registry (DHR) seeks to monitor nationwide activity and quality of invasive diagnostic and treatment strategies in patients with ischemic heart disease as well as valvular heart disease and to provide data for research. STUDY POPULATION: All adult (≥15 years) patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting, and heart valve surgery performed across all Danish hospitals were included. MAIN VARIABLES: The DHR contains a subset of the data stored in the Eastern and Western Denmark Heart Registries (EDHR and WDHR). For each type of procedure, up to 70 variables are registered in the DHR. Since 2010, the data quality protocol encompasses fulfillment of web-based validation rules of daily-submitted records and yearly approval of the data by the EDHR and WDHR. DESCRIPTIVE DATA: The data collection on procedure has been complete for PCI and surgery since 2000, and for CAG as of 2006. From 2000 to 2014, the number of CAG, PCI, and surgical procedures changed by 231%, 193%, and 99%, respectively. Until the end of 2014, a total of 357,476 CAG, 131,309 PCI, and 60,831 surgical procedures had been performed, corresponding to 249,445, 100,609, and 55,539 first-time patients, respectively. The DHR generally has a high level of completeness (1-missing) of each procedure (>90%) when compared to the National Patient Registry. Variables important for assessing the quality of care have a high level of completeness for surgery since 2000, and for CAG and PCI since 2010.
conclusionThe DHR contains valuable data on cardiac invasive procedures, which makes it an important national monitoring and quality system and at the same time serves as a platform for research projects in the cardiovascular field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.