Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27821985›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2016

Perinatal Outcome of the Second Twin at a Tertiary Care Center in India.

Hiralal Konar, Madhutandra Sarkar, Joydip Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparison of Auditory Brainstem Maturation in Prematurely Born Twin and Singleton Infants: A Retrospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Second Twin: Outcomes and Lessons in a Northern Nigerian Tertiary Hospital.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hiralal KonarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal India.
Madhutandra SarkarDepartment of Community Medicine, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India ; 221 Central Avenue, DAE Township, Kalpakkam, 603 102 Tamil Nadu India.
Joydip PaulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal India.
Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital · INChettinad Health City · INCollege of Medicine & Sagore Dutta Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis cross-sectional observational study was undertaken to assess perinatal outcome of the second twin in respect to gestational age, presentation, mode of delivery, and birth weight.

methodsSeventy women with confirmed twin pregnancy were admitted and managed in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kolkata, India from May 2008 to April 2009. All relevant data were recorded and analyzed statistically by simple proportions and

resultsWomen with frequent antenatal visits had highly favorable perinatal outcome than those with fewer or no visits in this hospital (

conclusionsGestational age, presentation, mode of delivery, and birth weight are the significant determinants of perinatal outcome of the second twin. Women with frequent antenatal care show favorable outcome. The second twin is at higher risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality than the first twin.

Indexed as

Birth weightGestational agePerinatal mortalitySecond twinTwin pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID27821985
PMCPMC5080221
OpenAlexW2191594095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.