ArticleBMJ open2016
Study protocol for a framework analysis using video review to identify latent safety threats: trauma resuscitation using in situ simulation team training (TRUST).
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Introducing the Safety Threats and Adverse events in Trauma (STAT) taxonomy: standardized classification system for evaluating safety during trauma resuscitation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Article
- Article
- GENESISS 1-Generating Standards for In-Situ Simulation project: a scoping review and conceptual model.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022Article
- Video recording emergency care and video-reflection to improve patient care; a narrative review and case-study of a neonatal intensive care unit.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Leveraging Telemedicine for Quality Improvement Video Review of Critical ICU Events: A Novel Multidisciplinary Form of Education.Critical care explorations · 2021Article
- Article
- Latent safety threat identification during in situ simulation debriefing: a qualitative analysis.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
- A prospective randomised simulation trial comparing our novel AIR-BOX to standard airway equipment storage modalities.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
- Multiprofessional perspectives on the identification of latent safety threats via in situ simulation: a prospective cohort pilot study.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
- Pushing boundaries of video review in trauma: using comprehensive data to improve the safety of trauma care.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2020Article
- In-situ simulations for COVID-19: a safety II approach towards resilient performance.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2020Article
- Lessons learned in preparing for and responding to the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: one simulation's program experience adapting to the new normal.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2020Article
- Tracking workflow during high-stakes resuscitation: the application of a novel clinician movement tracing tool during in situ trauma simulation.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2019Article
- Article
- Interaction patterns of trauma providers are associated with length of stay.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Detecting latent safety threats in an interprofessional training that combines in situ simulation with task training in an emergency department.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionErrors in trauma resuscitation are common and have been attributed to breakdowns in the coordination of system elements (eg, tools/technology, physical environment and layout, individual skills/knowledge, team interaction). These breakdowns are triggered by unique circumstances and may go unrecognised by trauma team members or hospital administrators; they can be described as latent safety threats (LSTs). Retrospective approaches to identifying LSTs (ie, after they occur) are likely to be incomplete and prone to bias. To date, prospective studies have not used video review as the primary mechanism to identify any and all LSTs in trauma resuscitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A series of 12 unannounced in situ simulations (ISS) will be conducted to prospectively identify LSTs at a level 1 Canadian trauma centre (over 800 dedicated trauma team activations annually). 4 scenarios have already been designed as part of this protocol based on 5 recurring themes found in the hospital's mortality and morbidity process. The actual trauma team will be activated to participate in the study. Each simulation will be audio/video recorded from 4 different camera angles and transcribed to conduct a framework analysis. Video reviewers will code the videos deductively based on a priori themes of LSTs identified from the literature, and/or inductively based on the events occurring in the simulation. LSTs will be prioritised to target interventions in future work. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional research ethics approval has been acquired (SMH REB #15-046). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences. Findings will also be presented to key institutional stakeholders to inform mitigation strategies for improved patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.