Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27821534›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Heterotaxy in Caenorhabditis: widespread natural variation in left-right arrangement of the major organs.

Melissa R Alcorn, Davon C Callander, Agustín López-Santos, Yamila N Torres Cleuren, Bilge Birsoy, Pradeep M Joshi, Anna W Santure, Joel H Rothman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Introduction to provocative questions in left-right asymmetry.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Melissa R AlcornDepartment of MCD Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6284-3255
Davon C CallanderDepartment of MCD Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Agustín López-SantosSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Yamila N Torres CleurenDepartment of MCD Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Bilge BirsoyDepartment of MCD Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4337-4582
Pradeep M JoshiDepartment of MCD Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4220-0559
Anna W SantureSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Joel H RothmanDepartment of MCD Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA joel.rothman@lifesci.ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6844-1377

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Developmental reprogramming and transorganogenesisR01HD081266 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI Joel H. Rothman · 2015 to 2026
$3.0M
Plasticity in an embryonic gene regulatory networkR01HD082347 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI ROTHMAN, JOEL H. · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
Mechanisms of Developmental FidelityR21HD085211 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI ROTHMAN, JOEL H. · 2015 to 2016
$396k
Role of membrane-localized nuclear hormone receptor in C. elegans dauer pathwayF32GM083557 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BIRSOY, BILGE · 2008 to 2009
$97k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081266NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082347NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD085211NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM083557NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the arrangement of internal organs in most metazoans is profoundly left-right (L/R) asymmetric with a predominant handedness, rare individuals show full (mirror-symmetric) or partial (heterotaxy) reversals. While the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is known for its highly determinate development, including stereotyped L/R organ handedness, we found that L/R asymmetry of the major organs, the gut and gonad, varies among natural isolates of the species in both males and hermaphrodites. In hermaphrodites, heterotaxy can involve one or both bilaterally asymmetric gonad arms. Male heterotaxy is probably not attributable to relaxed selection in this hermaphroditic species, as it is also seen in gonochoristic Caenorhabditis species. Heterotaxy increases in many isolates at elevated temperature, with one showing a pregastrulation temperature-sensitive period, suggesting a very early embryonic or germline effect on this much later developmental outcome. A genome-wide association study of 100 isolates showed that male heterotaxy is associated with three genomic regions. Analysis of recombinant inbred lines suggests that a small number of loci are responsible for the observed variation. These findings reveal that heterotaxy is a widely varying quantitative trait in an animal with an otherwise highly stereotyped anatomy, demonstrating unexpected plasticity in an L/R arrangement of the major organs even in a simple animal.This article is part of the themed issue 'Provocative questions in left-right asymmetry'.

Indexed as

Body PatterningGenome-Wide Association StudyOrganogenesisAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansGastrointestinal TractGonadsMaleC. elegansGWASheterotaxyleft–right asymmetrynatural variation

Identifiers

PMID27821534
PMCPMC5104504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.