Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27821517›Full record

ReviewAoB PLANTS2016

Tree invasions and biosecurity: eco-evolutionary dynamics of hitchhiking fungi.

Treena I Burgess, Casparus J Crous, Bernard Slippers, Jarkko Hantula, Michael J Wingfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AoB PLANTS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Plant Pathogenic and EndophyticMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pest categorisation ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Treena I BurgessCentre of Phytophthora Science and Management, School of Veterinary and Life Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia tburgess@murdoch.edu.au.
Casparus J CrousForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Bernard SlippersForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Jarkko HantulaNatural Resources Institute Finland, Natural Resources and Bioproduction Unit, Vantaa 01300, Finland.
Michael J WingfieldCentre of Phytophthora Science and Management, School of Veterinary and Life Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When non-native plants reach novel environments, they typically arrive with hidden microbiomes. In general, most of these hitchhikers remain on their co-evolved hosts, some contribute to the invasiveness of their hosts, and a small number can undergo host shifts and move onto native hosts. Invasion success can vary depending upon the different categories of fungal associates. When an invader tree relies on a fungal mutualism to survive in the new environment, there is a fundamentally lower likelihood of either the tree, or the fungus, establishing novel associations. In contrast, parasitic hitchhikers could merely use their host plants to move through the landscape and to become established on new hosts (host shifts). Evidence suggests the frequency of these host shifts is low and depends upon the fungal functional group. However, epidemics caused by invasive pathogens in native ecosystems have occurred globally. Thus, elucidating the potential for hidden non-native fungi to form novel host associations in a new environment is important for biodiversity conservation.

Indexed as

Canker pathogenseco-evolutionary experiencehost shiftsmycorrhizanovel environmentsoomycetestree pathogen

Identifiers

PMID27821517
PMCPMC5206332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.