Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27821489›Full record

ArticleCancer research2017

A Transcriptional Signature Identifies LKB1 Functional Status as a Novel Determinant of MEK Sensitivity in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Jacob M Kaufman, Tadaaki Yamada, Kyungho Park, Cynthia D Timmers, Joseph M Amann, David P Carbone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cancer discovery · 2018
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BeyondPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  12. LKB1/AMPK Pathway and Drug Response in Cancer: A Therapeutic Perspective.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacob M KaufmanDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Tadaaki YamadaDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kyungho ParkDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Cynthia D TimmersOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Joseph M AmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, James Thoracic Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
David P CarboneDepartment of Internal Medicine, James Thoracic Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. david.carbone@osumc.edu.
Kanazawa University · JPVanderbilt University · US

Funding

TARGETING NOTCH 3 IN LUNG CANCERP50CA090949 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MASSION, PIERRE P. · 2001 to 2011
$24.1M
Molecular Signatures of Lung CancerU01CA114771 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CARBONE, DAVID P. · 2005 to 2010
$8.7M
ECOG-ACRIN Thoracic Malignancies Integrated Translational Science CenterU10CA180950 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI RAMALINGAM, SURESH S · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090949NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114771NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

LKB1 is a commonly mutated tumor suppressor in non-small cell lung cancer that exerts complex effects on signal transduction and transcriptional regulation. To better understand the downstream impact of loss of functional LKB1, we developed a transcriptional fingerprint assay representing this phenotype. This assay was predictive of LKB1 functional loss in cell lines and clinical specimens, even those without detected sequence alterations in the gene. In silico screening of drug sensitivity data identified putative LKB1-selective drug candidates, revealing novel associations not apparent from analysis of LKB1 mutations alone. Among the candidates, MEK inhibitors showed robust association with signature expression in both training and testing datasets independent of RAS/RAF mutations. This susceptibility phenotype is directly altered by RNA interference-mediated LKB1 knockdown or by LKB1 re-expression into mutant cell lines and is readily observed in vivo using a xenograft model. MEK sensitivity is dependent on LKB1-induced changes in AKT and FOXO3 activation, consistent with genomic and proteomic analyses of LKB1-deficient lung adenocarcinomas. Our findings implicate the MEK pathway as a potential therapeutic target for LKB1-deficient cancers and define a practical NanoString biomarker to identify functional LKB1 loss. Cancer Res; 77(1); 153-63. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAnimalsBenzimidazolesBiomarkers, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHeterograftsHumansImmunoblottingLung NeoplasmsMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMiceMice, Inbred NODAMP-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesAZD 6244BenzimidazolesBiomarkers, TumorMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesPyridonesPyrimidinonesSTK11 protein, humantrametinib

Identifiers

PMID27821489
PMCPMC7027166
OpenAlexW2555901907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.