Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27821432›Full record

ArticleGenetics2017

Inferring Heterozygosity from Ancient and Low Coverage Genomes.

Athanasios Kousathanas, Christoph Leuenberger, Vivian Link, Christian Sell, Joachim Burger, Daniel Wegmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. snpAD: an ancient DNA genotype caller.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Human evolution: a tale from ancient genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Athanasios KousathanasDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.
Christoph LeuenbergerDepartment of Mathematics, University of Fribourg, 1200, Switzerland.
Vivian LinkDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.
Christian SellPaleogenetics Group, University of Mainz, 55122, Germany.
Joachim BurgerPaleogenetics Group, University of Mainz, 55122, Germany.
Daniel WegmannDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland daniel.wegmann@unifr.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While genetic diversity can be quantified accurately from high coverage sequencing data, it is often desirable to obtain such estimates from data with low coverage, either to save costs or because of low DNA quality, as is observed for ancient samples. Here, we introduce a method to accurately infer heterozygosity probabilistically from sequences with average coverage [Formula: see text] of a single individual. The method relaxes the infinite sites assumption of previous methods, does not require a reference sequence, except for the initial alignment of the sequencing data, and takes into account both variable sequencing errors and potential postmortem damage. It is thus also applicable to nonmodel organisms and ancient genomes. Since error rates as reported by sequencing machines are generally distorted and require recalibration, we also introduce a method to accurately infer recalibration parameters in the presence of postmortem damage. This method does not require knowledge about the underlying genome sequence, but instead works with haploid data (e.g., from the X-chromosome from mammalian males) and integrates over the unknown genotypes. Using extensive simulations we show that a few megabasepairs of haploid data are sufficient for accurate recalibration, even at average coverages as low as [Formula: see text] At similar coverages, our method also produces very accurate estimates of heterozygosity down to [Formula: see text] within windows of about 1 Mbp. We further illustrate the usefulness of our approach by inferring genome-wide patterns of diversity for several ancient human samples, and we found that 3000-5000-year-old samples showed diversity patterns comparable to those of modern humans. In contrast, two European hunter-gatherer samples exhibited not only considerably lower levels of diversity than modern samples, but also highly distinct distributions of diversity along their genomes. Interestingly, these distributions were also very different between the two samples, supporting earlier conclusions of a highly diverse and structured population in Europe prior to the arrival of farming.

Indexed as

Base SequenceChromosome MappingDNA, AncientGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenome, HumanHeterozygoteHumansMaleSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareDNA, Ancientancient DNAbase recalibrationheterozygositylow coveragepostmortem damage

Identifiers

PMID27821432
PMCPMC5223511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.