ArticleGenetics2017
Inferring Heterozygosity from Ancient and Low Coverage Genomes.
Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The practice and promise of temporal genomics for measuring evolutionary responses to global change.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Pooled it
- Population genomics, demography, and circum-Baltic connectivity of Early Medieval southwestern Finland.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Seizure samples reveal complex evolutionary dynamics among Southeast Asian pangolins.Heredity · 2026Article
- Minor Allele Frequency Filtering Can Strongly Bias Uniqueness Estimates Within and Across Species.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Reconstruction of the lifeways of Central European Late Bronze Age communities using ancient DNA, isotope and osteoarchaeological analyses.Nature communications · 2026Article
- ERGA-CBP chromosome-level genome assembly of the blind scorpionOpen research Europe · 2026Article
- Estimating allele frequencies, ancestry proportions and genotype likelihoods in the presence of mapping bias.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Ancient genomes provide evidence of demographic shift to Slavic-associated groups in Moravia.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Impact of Holocene environmental change on the evolutionary ecology of an Arctic top predator.Science advances · 2023Article
- CONGA: Copy number variation genotyping in ancient genomes and low-coverage sequencing data.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Parental relatedness through time revealed by runs of homozygosity in ancient DNA.Nature communications · 2021Article
- The mosaic genome of indigenous African cattle as a unique genetic resource for African pastoralism.Nature genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Joint Estimates of Heterozygosity and Runs of Homozygosity for Modern and Ancient Samples.Genetics · 2019Article
- The presence and impact of reference bias on population genomic studies of prehistoric human populations.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- snpAD: an ancient DNA genotype caller.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Human evolution: a tale from ancient genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While genetic diversity can be quantified accurately from high coverage sequencing data, it is often desirable to obtain such estimates from data with low coverage, either to save costs or because of low DNA quality, as is observed for ancient samples. Here, we introduce a method to accurately infer heterozygosity probabilistically from sequences with average coverage [Formula: see text] of a single individual. The method relaxes the infinite sites assumption of previous methods, does not require a reference sequence, except for the initial alignment of the sequencing data, and takes into account both variable sequencing errors and potential postmortem damage. It is thus also applicable to nonmodel organisms and ancient genomes. Since error rates as reported by sequencing machines are generally distorted and require recalibration, we also introduce a method to accurately infer recalibration parameters in the presence of postmortem damage. This method does not require knowledge about the underlying genome sequence, but instead works with haploid data (e.g., from the X-chromosome from mammalian males) and integrates over the unknown genotypes. Using extensive simulations we show that a few megabasepairs of haploid data are sufficient for accurate recalibration, even at average coverages as low as [Formula: see text] At similar coverages, our method also produces very accurate estimates of heterozygosity down to [Formula: see text] within windows of about 1 Mbp. We further illustrate the usefulness of our approach by inferring genome-wide patterns of diversity for several ancient human samples, and we found that 3000-5000-year-old samples showed diversity patterns comparable to those of modern humans. In contrast, two European hunter-gatherer samples exhibited not only considerably lower levels of diversity than modern samples, but also highly distinct distributions of diversity along their genomes. Interestingly, these distributions were also very different between the two samples, supporting earlier conclusions of a highly diverse and structured population in Europe prior to the arrival of farming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.