Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27821155›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2016

Psychiatric readmissions and their association with environmental and health system characteristics: a systematic review of the literature.

Jorid Kalseth, Eva Lassemo, Kristian Wahlbeck, Peija Haaramo, Jon Magnussen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Continuity of care and therapeutic relationships as critical elements in acute psychiatric care.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jorid KalsethSINTEF Technology and Society, Health Research, P.O. Box 4760 Sluppen, NO-7465, Trondheim, Norway. jorid.kalseth@sintef.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-4243
Eva LassemoSINTEF Technology and Society, Health Research, P.O. Box 4760 Sluppen, NO-7465, Trondheim, Norway.
Kristian WahlbeckNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Mental Health Unit, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Peija HaaramoNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Mental Health Unit, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Jon MagnussenDepartment of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, P.O. Box 8905, MTFS, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychiatric readmissions have been studied at length. However, knowledge about how environmental and health system characteristics affect readmission rates is scarce. This paper systemically reviews and discusses the impact of health and social systems as well as environmental characteristics for readmission after discharge from inpatient care for patients with a psychiatric diagnosis.

methodsComprehensive literature searches were conducted in the electronic bibliographic databases Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, ProQuest Health Management and OpenGrey. In addition, Google Scholar was utilised. Relevant publications published between January 1990 and June 2014 were included. No restrictions regarding language or publication status were imposed. A qualitative synthesis of the included studies was performed. Variables describing system and environmental characteristics were grouped into three groups: those capturing regulation, financing system and governance; those capturing capacity, organisation and structure; and those capturing environmental variables.

resultsOf the 734 unique articles identified in the original search, 35 were included in the study. There is a limited number of studies on psychiatric readmissions and their association with environmental and health system characteristics. Even though the review reveals an extensive list of characteristics studied, most characteristics appear in a very limited number of articles. The most frequently studied characteristics are related to location (local area, district/region/country). In most cases area differences were found, providing strong indication that the risk of readmission not only relates to patient characteristics but also to system and/or environmental factors that vary between areas. The literature also points in the direction of a negative association of institutional length of stay and community aftercare with readmission for psychiatric patients.

conclusionThis review shows that analyses of system level variables are scarce. Furthermore they differ with respect to purpose, choice of system characteristics and the way these characteristics are measured. The lack of studies looking at the relationship between readmissions and provider payment models is striking. Without the link to provider payment models and other health system characteristics related to regulation, financing system and governance structure it becomes more difficult to draw policy implications from these analyses.

Indexed as

Follow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMental DisordersOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargePatient ReadmissionRehabilitation, VocationalEnvironmentHealth care systemPsychiatryReadmissionRecidivismRehospitalisationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27821155
PMCPMC5100223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.