Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27821144›Full record

Trial reportJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale2016

Harmonic scalpel impact on blood loss and operating time in major head and neck surgery: a randomized clinical trial.

Dieter K Fritz, T Wayne Matthews, Shamir P Chandarana, Steven C Nakoneshny, Joseph C Dort

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02017834 (Does the Harmonic Scalpel Reduce Operating Time and Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Prospective, Randomized Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02017834 nacompletednot on this map

Does the Harmonic Scalpel Reduce Operating Time and Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Prospective, Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2012 to 2014Enrolled36ConditionsOral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Treated With SurgeryArmssurgical resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dieter K FritzDepartment of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
T Wayne MatthewsDepartment of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Shamir P ChandaranaDepartment of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Steven C NakoneshnyOhlson Research Initiative, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Joseph C DortDepartment of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 2A02, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada. jdort@ucalgary.ca.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong operating time and high blood loss contribute to post-surgical morbidity. Therefore, strategies to reduce these factors should to be tested using robust methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of using the harmonic scalpel on operating time and blood loss in patients undergoing resection for advanced oral cancer (OSCC).

methodsThirty-six adult head and neck cancer patients with advanced OSCC requiring primary tumor resection with uni- or bi- lateral selective neck dissection from July 2012 to September 2014 were randomized to either the control group (traditional surgery) or the experimental group (harmonic surgery). Patients older than 18 years who were able to provide informed consent were eligible. Primary outcomes of interest were: intraoperative blood loss (mL) and operative time (minutes) for the ablative part of the surgery.

resultsMean blood loss in the experimental group was 260 mL versus 403 mL in the control group (p = 0.08). Mean operative time was 140 min in the experimental group and 159 min in the control group (p = 0.2).

conclusionsIn this randomized controlled trial, use of the harmonic scalpel did not effect intraoperative blood loss or OR time in patients undergoing surgery for advanced OSCC.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02017834 .

Indexed as

Operative TimeSurgical InstrumentsAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHemostasis, SurgicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck DissectionOropharyngeal NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeHarmonic scalpelHead and neck squamous cell carcinomaHealth technology assessmentOral cancerRandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID27821144
PMCPMC5100249
OpenAlexW2553695491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.