ArticleBMC ophthalmology2016
Publication trends in corneal transplantation: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turkish Retinoblastoma Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (1966-2024).Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Publication trends in the field of the cornea in the last 4 decades: a bibliometric study.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the uveitis literature and research trends over the past two decades.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Global trends and prospects in research of artificial cornea over past 20 years: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Article
- Oculoplastic publication trends in general ophthalmology journals.International journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Global output of research on epidermal parasitic skin diseases from 1967 to 2017.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2018Article
- TRENDS IN UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.Acta ortopedica brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur aim was to demonstrate the publication trends of corneal transplantation in the last decade.
methodsAll of the keratoplasty research articles, letters, case reports, reviews and meeting abstracts published between January 2006 and December 2015 indexed on the Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge were evaluated. A bibliometric filter was used to capture keratoplasty related publications by using the key words 'keratoplasty', 'corneal transplantation' or 'keratoprosthesis' in the 'title' selection mode.
resultsA total of 2726 publications were evaluated in the present study. Documents related to penetrating keratoplasty only have been decreased, whereas the documents related to endothelial keratoplasty were increased in the last decade. The total keratoplasty publication counts had been increased from the year 2006 to 2015. The average citation count per keratoplasty documents was 9.34.
conclusionsThere is a growing interest to the lamellar keratoplasty techniques especially the endothelial keratoplasty in the last decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.