Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27821086›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Antineoplastic treatment effect on bone mineral density in Mexican breast cancer patients.

Karina Monroy-Cisneros, Julián Esparza-Romero, Mauro E Valencia, Alfonso G Guevara-Torres, Rosa O Méndez-Estrada, Iván Anduro-Corona, Humberto Astiazarán-García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of cytotoxic chemotherapy on bone health among breast cancer patients. Does it require intervention?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dietary Guidelines for Breast Cancer Patients: A Critical Review.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karina Monroy-CisnerosCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD), Coordinación de Nutrición, Carretera a La Victoria km 0.6, C.P. 83304, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Julián Esparza-RomeroCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD), Coordinación de Nutrición, Carretera a La Victoria km 0.6, C.P. 83304, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Mauro E ValenciaDepartamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, Coordinación de Ciencias Nutricionales, Universidad de Sonora, Blvd. Luis Encinas y Rosales S/N, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Alfonso G Guevara-TorresCentro Estatal de Oncología (CEO), Reforma final y Paseo Río San Miguel, C.P. 83280, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Rosa O Méndez-EstradaCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD), Coordinación de Nutrición, Carretera a La Victoria km 0.6, C.P. 83304, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Iván Anduro-CoronaCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD), Coordinación de Nutrición, Carretera a La Victoria km 0.6, C.P. 83304, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.
Humberto Astiazarán-GarcíaCentro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD), Coordinación de Nutrición, Carretera a La Victoria km 0.6, C.P. 83304, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. hastiazaran@ciad.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer is the most deadly malignancy in Mexican women. Although treatment has improved, it may significantly affect bone mineral status in those who receive it. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of cancer treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC), in patients with breast cancer and explore the interaction of menopausal status and clinical stage with cancer treatment on such changes.

methodsA quasi-experimental design was applied with measurements before and after a chemotherapy treatment in 40 patients with primary diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. BMD and body composition measurements were taken by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and changes in these variables due to therapy were analyzed using mixed regression for repeated measurements.

resultsSignificant loss was found in femoral neck and L2-L4 BMD (p < 0.001). Patients diagnosed with osteopenia or osteoporosis received calcium + vitamin D supplementation (600 mg/200 IU day). It showed a protective effect in the decrease of femoral neck BMD and total BMC. BMD loss in both femoral neck and L2-L4 BMD was higher in premenopausal women: 0.023 g/cm

conclusionThe antineoplastic breast cancer treatment with chemotherapy had a negative impact on BMD, in premenopausal women overall, although a differential effect was found according to clinical stage and calcium supplementation status.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAdultAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBone DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMenopauseMexicoMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRisk FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBone resorptionBreast neoplasmCalciumChemotherapyMenopause

Identifiers

PMID27821086
PMCPMC5100258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.