Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27820830›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Budding Yeast Rif1 Controls Genome Integrity by Inhibiting rDNA Replication.

Maksym Shyian, Stefano Mattarocci, Benjamin Albert, Lukas Hafner, Aleksandra Lezaja, Michael Costanzo, Charlie Boone, David Shore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Ribosomal DNA instability and genome adaptability.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maksym ShyianDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stefano MattarocciDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Benjamin AlbertDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lukas HafnerDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aleksandra LezajaDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michael CostanzoUniversity of Toronto, Donnelly Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charlie BooneUniversity of Toronto, Donnelly Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David ShoreDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CHUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rif1 protein is a negative regulator of DNA replication initiation in eukaryotes. Here we show that budding yeast Rif1 inhibits DNA replication initiation at the rDNA locus. Absence of Rif1, or disruption of its interaction with PP1/Glc7 phosphatase, leads to more intensive rDNA replication. The effect of Rif1-Glc7 on rDNA replication is similar to that of the Sir2 deacetylase, and the two would appear to act in the same pathway, since the rif1Δ sir2Δ double mutant shows no further increase in rDNA replication. Loss of Rif1-Glc7 activity is also accompanied by an increase in rDNA repeat instability that again is not additive with the effect of sir2Δ. We find, in addition, that the viability of rif1Δ cells is severely compromised in combination with disruption of the MRX or Ctf4-Mms22 complexes, both of which are implicated in stabilization of stalled replication forks. Significantly, we show that removal of the rDNA replication fork barrier (RFB) protein Fob1, alleviation of replisome pausing by deletion of the Tof1/Csm3 complex, or a large deletion of the rDNA repeat array all rescue this synthetic growth defect of rif1Δ cells lacking in addition either MRX or Ctf4-Mms22 activity. These data suggest that the repression of origin activation by Rif1-Glc7 is important to avoid the deleterious accumulation of stalled replication forks at the rDNA RFB, which become lethal when fork stability is compromised. Finally, we show that Rif1-Glc7, unlike Sir2, has an important effect on origin firing outside of the rDNA locus that serves to prevent activation of the DNA replication checkpoint. Our results thus provide insights into a mechanism of replication control within a large repetitive chromosomal domain and its importance for the maintenance of genome stability. These findings may have important implications for metazoans, where large blocks of repetitive sequences are much more common.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA ReplicationDNA, RibosomalGenomic InstabilityProtein Phosphatase 1Replication OriginRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSilent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSirtuin 2TelomereTelomere-Binding ProteinsCTF4 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, RibosomalGLC7 protein, S cerevisiaeMms22 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein Phosphatase 1Repressor ProteinsRIF1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSilent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSIR2 protein, S cerevisiaeSirtuin 2Telomere-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27820830
PMCPMC5098799
OpenAlexW2551328408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.