Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27820735›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2017

Consequences of extracellular trap formation in sepsis.

Xian M O'Brien, Bethany M Biron, Jonathan S Reichner

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Corticosteroids in ARDS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A novel role for lidocaine in COVID-19 patients?British journal of anaesthesia · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xian M O'BrienaDepartment of Surgery, Rhode Island Hospital bWarren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Bethany M Biron
Jonathan S Reichner
Rhode Island Hospital · USBrown University · US

Funding

Neutrophil-endothelial interactions and barrier function in sepsisR01HL125265 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KIM, MINSOO, REICHNER, JONATHAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.9M
Effect of Neutrophil Priming on Chemotaxis and SignalingR01GM066194 · NIGMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI REICHNER, JONATHAN S · 2003 to 2011
$2.4M
Use of Biomimicry to Determine the Effect of Sepsis on Neutrophil TractionR01AI116629 · NIAID · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI FRANCK, CHRISTIAN, REICHNER, JONATHAN S · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Effect of Neutrophil Priming on Chemotaxis and SignalingR56GM066194 · NIGMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI REICHNER, JONATHAN S · 2007 to 2007
$254k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125265NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116629NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066194NIGMS NIH HHS R56 GM066194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review will focus on in-vivo findings derived from animal models of sepsis regarding the trapping role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) which is difficult to assess ex vivo. The NETotic response of neutrophils at sites of sterile injury or autoimmune disease is destructive as no antimicrobial advantage to the host is realized and dampening NETosis is largely beneficial. In early stages of local infection or in sepsis, the trapping function of NETs may help abscess formation and limit microbial dissemination. RECENT

findingsThe trapping function of NETs limits bacterial dissemination keeping an abscess from becoming bacteremic or confining tissue infection to local sites. Once containment is lost and disease has progressed, the best therapeutic approach suggested by animal studies to date is to inhibit protein arginine deiminase 4 and prevent NETosis rather than attempting to neutralize caustic NET components. Prognostic value may best be realized by taking cell free DNA, citrulllinated histones, neutrophil function and counts of immature granulocytes into consideration rather than rely on any one measure alone. SUMMARY: The trapping function of NETs may supercede the value of antimicrobial function in the early phases of sepsis such that degradation of the DNA backbone is contraindicated.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaDeoxyribonucleasesDisease Models, AnimalExtracellular TrapsHistonesHumansHydrolasesNeutrophil InfiltrationNeutrophilsProtein-Arginine DeiminasesProtein-Arginine Deiminase Type 4Reactive Oxygen SpeciesSepsisSignal TransductionDeoxyribonucleasesHistonesHydrolasesPADI4 protein, humanProtein-Arginine DeiminasesProtein-Arginine Deiminase Type 4Reactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID27820735
PMCPMC5892420
OpenAlexW2548356077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.