Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27820659›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2017

No Increase in Fractures After Stopping Hormone Therapy: Results From the Women's Health Initiative.

Nelson B Watts, Jane A Cauley, Rebecca D Jackson, Andrea Z LaCroix, Cora E Lewis, JoAnn E Manson, Joan M Neuner, Lawrence S Phillips, Marcia L Stefanick, Jean Wactawski-Wende and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Then and Now: What We Have Learned From the WHI.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Pharmacological Therapies for Osteoporosis: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Is there a role for menopausal hormone therapy in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Review
  11. Lessons learned with Bone Health TeleECHO: making treatment decisions when guidelines conflict.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Estrogen therapy for osteoporosis in the modern era.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Nelson B WattsMercy Health Osteoporosis and Bone Health Services, Cincinnati, Ohio 45236.
Jane A CauleyGraduate School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261.
Rebecca D JacksonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210.
Andrea Z LaCroixWomen's Health Center of Excellence, Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093.
Cora E LewisDivision of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294.
JoAnn E MansonBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Joan M NeunerMedical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center Population Science, Division of General Internal Medicine and Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226.
Lawrence S PhillipsAtlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia 30033.
Marcia L StefanickStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305.
Jean Wactawski-WendeDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14214; and.
Carolyn CrandallDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Women’s Health Initiative Investigators
Atlanta VA Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USMercy Health · USStanford University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A comparative effectiveness studyU01DK098246 · NIDDK · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KRAUSE-STEINRAUF, HEIDI, LACHIN, JOHN M · 2012 to 2022
$238.9M
Translational Research Core - Engagement and Behavior ChangeP30DK111024 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Mohammed Kumail Ali · 2016 to 2026
$13.4M
Screening for IGT: Glucose Challenge vs Predictive ModelR18DK066204 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, LAWRENCE S · 2004 to 2007
$2.9M
Prevention of Cystic Fibrosis DiabetesR01FD003527 · FDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STECENKO, ARLENE A · 2009 to 2015
$908k
Vitamin D for Type 2 Diabetes (D2D trial)U34DK091958 · NIDDK · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI PITTAS, ANASTASSIOS G · 2011 to 2012
$792k
Reach, Outcomes and System Impacts of the VA's National Weight Loss Program, MOVER21DK099716 · NIDDK · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, LAWRENCE S · 2014 to 2015
$321k
Prediction of CVD Risk in VeteransI01CX001025 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI CHO, KELLY, WILSON, PETER WYMAN · 2014 to 2025
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001025FDA HHS R01 FD003527NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111024NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK066204NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK099716NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK098246NIDDK NIH HHS U34 DK091958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy (HT) trials showed protection against hip and total fractures, but a later observational report suggested loss of benefit and a rebound increased risk after cessation of HT. Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine fractures after discontinuation of HT. Design and Setting: Two placebo-controlled randomized trials served as the study setting. Patients: Study patients included WHI participants (N = 15,187) who continued active HT or placebo through the intervention period and who did not take HT in the postintervention period. Interventions: Trial interventions included conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in naturally menopausal women and CEE alone in women with prior hysterectomy. Main Outcome Measures: Total fractures and hip fractures through 5 years after discontinuation of HT were recorded. Results: Hip fractures were infrequent (∼2.5 per 1000 person-years); this finding was similar between trials and in former HT and placebo groups. There was no difference in total fractures in the CEE + MPA trial for former HT vs former placebo users (28.9 per 1000 person-years and 29.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.09; P = 0.63); however, in the CEE-alone trial, total fractures were higher in former placebo users (36.9 per 1000 person-years) compared with the former active group (31.1 per 1000 person-years), a finding that was suggestive of a residual benefit of CEE against total fractures (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = 0.03). Conclusions: We found no evidence for increased fracture risk, either sustained or transient, for former HT users compared with former placebo users after stopping HT. There was residual benefit for total fractures in former HT users from the CEE-alone study.

Indexed as

FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHip FracturesHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPostmenopausePrognosisWithholding TreatmentWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID27820659
PMCPMC6287395
OpenAlexW2551371245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.