Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27820636›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2016

The Spectrum of CHM Gene Mutations in Choroideremia and Their Relationship to Clinical Phenotype.

Matthew P Simunovic, Jasleen K Jolly, Kanmin Xue, Thomas L Edwards, Markus Groppe, Susan M Downes, Robert E MacLaren

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01461213 (An Open Label Dose Escalation Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Retinal Gene Therapy for Choroideraemia Using an Adeno-associated Viral Vector), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01461213 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

An Open Label Dose Escalation Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Retinal Gene Therapy for Choroideraemia Using an Adeno-associated Viral Vector (AAV2) Encoding Rab-escort Protein 1 (REP1)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2011 to 2017Enrolled14ConditionsChoroideremiaArmsrAAV2.REP1
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Gene therapy in patients with choroideremia: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Rekindling Vision: Innovative Strategies for Treating Retinal Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Choroideremia: The Endpoint Endgame.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Choroideremia: Toward Regulatory Approval of Retinal Gene Therapy.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Choroideremia Carriers: Dark-Adapted Perimetry and Retinal Structures.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew P SimunovicNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 2Oxford Eye Hospital, University of Oxford NHS Trust, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 3Save Sight Institute, Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 4Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jasleen K JollyNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 2Oxford Eye Hospital, University of Oxford NHS Trust, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kanmin XueNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 2Oxford Eye Hospital, University of Oxford NHS Trust, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Thomas L EdwardsNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 2Oxford Eye Hospital, University of Oxford NHS Trust, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Markus GroppeNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 2Oxford Eye Hospital, University of Oxford NHS Trust, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Susan M DownesNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 2Oxford Eye Hospital, University of Oxford NHS Trust, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Robert E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, University of Oxford West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 2Oxford Eye Hospital, University of Oxford NHS Trust, West Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom 5Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health EME/12/66/35Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe report the underlying genotype and explore possible genotypic-phenotypic correlations in a large cohort of choroideremia patients.

methodsWe studied prospectively a cohort of 79 patients diagnosed within a tertiary referral service for patients with retinal dystrophies. Phenotypic evaluation consisted of clinical examination, including visual acuity and residual retinal area by fundus autofluorescence (FAF). Genotype was established by sequencing. We also investigated whether particular genotypes were associated with more severe phenotypes by performing analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with visual acuity and FAF as the dependent variables and age as the covariant.

resultsA total of 74 (94%) of patients in our cohort had causative mutations by sequencing, the majority of which were anticipated to be null. Of these, 35 (47%) had insertions and deletions, 13 (18%) had mutations predicted to affect splicing, and 26 (35%) had single point mutations. In the latter case, 13 of 21 (62%) pedigrees with single point mutations were C to T transitions at C-phosphate-G (CpG) dinucleotides. These mutations were spread across 5 of only 24 CpG dinucleotides in the entire CHM cDNA. Furthermore, these 5 locations are the only sites at which C to T transitions result in a stop codon. No clear evidence was found for genotype-phenotype correlation except in the instance of a patient with a large deletion involving neighbouring sequences.

conclusionsIn patients with a diagnosis of choroideremia made by a specialty service, there is a high likelihood of establishing a genetic diagnosis. The majority of causative mutations appear to be null and, therefore, may benefit from gene replacement therapy. A disproportionate number of single point mutations observed were C to T transitions, consistent with the evolutionary decay of CpG dinucleotides through methylation and subsequent deamination. Hence, the development of choroideremia in such patients may represent the unwanted consequence of human evolution; de novo mutations are predicted to arise at these sites in future generations. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01461213.).

Indexed as

MutationVisual AcuityAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdolescentAdultAgedChildChoroideremiaDNADNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiGenotypeHumansAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCHM protein, humanDNA

Identifiers

PMID27820636
PMCPMC5102569
OpenAlexW2554036070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.