Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27819659›Full record

ArticleNature methods2017

A statistical test for conserved RNA structure shows lack of evidence for structure in lncRNAs.

Elena Rivas, Jody Clements, Sean R Eddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 260 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. RNA regulation in plants.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Metamorphosis and lncRNAs: A Close Relationship.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2026
    Review

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena RivasDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Jody ClementsJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.
Sean R EddyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6676-4706

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many functional RNAs have an evolutionarily conserved secondary structure. Conservation of RNA base pairing induces pairwise covariations in sequence alignments. We developed a computational method, R-scape (RNA Structural Covariation Above Phylogenetic Expectation), that quantitatively tests whether covariation analysis supports the presence of a conserved RNA secondary structure. R-scape analysis finds no statistically significant support for proposed secondary structures of the long noncoding RNAs HOTAIR, SRA, and Xist.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyBase PairingBase SequenceHumansNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID27819659
PMCPMC5554622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.