ArticleRevista brasileira de ortopedia
The Brazilian version of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS-BR): convergent and construct validity, internal consistency, and unidimensionality.
Article in Revista brasileira de ortopedia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04146987 (Cost-Effectiveness of Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery by Open and Arthroscopic Techniques. Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cost-Effectiveness of Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery by Open and Arthroscopic Techniques. Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Study of the Indonesian Version of the Constant Score in Patients With Shoulder Pain.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- The Persian Version of Constant-murley Score in Patients with Rotator Cuff Tears: Reliability and Validity.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Two Techniques in the Arthroscopic Treatment of Partial Articular Rotator Cuff Tears after Six Years of Follow-up.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024Article
- [Functional comparison between arthroscopy and open surgery for rotator cuff injuries].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Observational
- Functional Shoulder Evaluation after Osteosynthesis of Greater Tuberosity Fracture: Is There any Influence of Glenohumeral Dislocation?Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2023Article
- Validity and reliability of the questionnaire of academic knowledge of teachers of basic general education.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Arthroscopic Treatment of Rotator Cuff Rupture in Patients Under 55 years Old versus Patients Older than 65 Years Old.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2022Article
- Arthroscopic Repair of Rotator Cuff Injury: An Analysis of Function, Muscular Strength and Pain Between Single Row and Double Row Techniques.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2022Article
- Acupuncture Analgesia in Patients with Postoperative Neck Pain: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- HYLAN G-F 20 VERSUS TRIAMCINOLONE IN THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY SHOULDER OSTEOARTHRITIS. RANDOMIZED TRIAL.Acta ortopedica brasileira · 2022Article
- Article
- How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Clinical Evaluation of the Surgical Treatment of Midshaft Clavicle Fractures at a Hospital in the South of Santa Catarina.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2020Article
- Chinese version of the Constant-Murley questionnaire for shoulder pain and disability: a reliability and validation study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2017Article
- Article
- Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?Revista brasileira de ortopediaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo translate and culturally adapt the CMS and assess the validity of the Brazilian version (CMS-BR).
methodsThe translation was carried out according to the back-translation method by four independent translators. The produced versions were synthesized through extensive analysis and by consensus of an expert committee, reaching a final version used for the cultural adaptation. A field test was conducted with 30 subjects in order to obtain semantic considerations. For the psychometric analyzes, the sample was increased to 110 participants who answered two instruments: CMS-BR and the Disabilities of the Arm, shoulder and Hand (DASH). The CMS-BR and DASH score range from 0 to 100 points. For the first, higher points reflect better function and for the latter, the inverse is true. The validity was verified by Pearson's correlation test, the unidimensionality by factorial analysis, and the internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha.
resultsThe explained variance was 60.28% with factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.91. The CMS-BR exhibited strong negative correlation with the DASH score (-0.82,
conclusionThe CMS was satisfactorily adapted for Brazilian Portuguese and demonstrated evidence of validity that allows its use in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.