Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27818655›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Prokaryotic Responses to Ammonium and Organic Carbon Reveal Alternative CO

Federico Baltar, Daniel Lundin, Joakim Palovaara, Itziar Lekunberri, Thomas Reinthaler, Gerhard J Herndl, Jarone Pinhassi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Federico BaltarCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, EEMiS, Linnaeus UniversityKalmar, Sweden; Department of Marine Sciences, University of OtagoDunedin, New Zealand; National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA)/University of Otago Research Centre for OceanographyDunedin, New Zealand.
Daniel LundinCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, EEMiS, Linnaeus University Kalmar, Sweden.
Joakim PalovaaraCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, EEMiS, Linnaeus University Kalmar, Sweden.
Itziar LekunberriDivision of Bio-Oceanography, Department of Limnology and Oceanography, University of ViennaVienna, Austria; Institut Català de Recerca de l'AiguaGirona, Spain.
Thomas ReinthalerDivision of Bio-Oceanography, Department of Limnology and Oceanography, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard J HerndlDivision of Bio-Oceanography, Department of Limnology and Oceanography, University of ViennaVienna, Austria; Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Utrecht UniversityDen Burg, Netherlands.
Jarone PinhassiCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, EEMiS, Linnaeus University Kalmar, Sweden.
Linnaeus University · SEUniversity of Vienna · ATNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research · NZUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 486Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23234Austrian Science Fund FWF Z 194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To decipher the response of mesopelagic prokaryotic communities to input of nutrients, we tracked changes in prokaryotic abundance, extracellular enzymatic activities, heterotrophic production, dark dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) fixation, community composition (16S rRNA sequencing) and community gene expression (metatranscriptomics) in 3 microcosm experiments with water from the mesopelagic North Atlantic. Responses in 3 different treatments amended with thiosulfate, ammonium or organic matter (i.e., pyruvate plus acetate) were compared to unamended controls. The strongest stimulation was found in the organic matter enrichments, where all measured rates increased >10-fold. Strikingly, in the organic matter treatment, the dark DIC fixation rates-assumed to be related to autotrophic metabolisms-were equally stimulated as all the other heterotrophic-related parameters. This increase in DIC fixation rates was paralleled by an up-regulation of genes involved in DIC assimilation via anaplerotic pathways. Alkaline phosphatase was the metabolic rate most strongly stimulated and its activity seemed to be related to cross-activation by nonpartner histidine kinases, and/or the activation of genes involved in the regulation of elemental balance during catabolic processes. These findings suggest that episodic events such as strong sedimentation of organic matter into the mesopelagic might trigger rapid increases of originally rare members of the prokaryotic community, enhancing heterotrophic and autotrophic carbon uptake rates, ultimately affecting carbon cycling. Our experiments highlight a number of fairly unstudied microbial processes of potential importance in mesopelagic waters that require future attention.

Indexed as

alkaline phosphataseCO2 fixationfunctional diversitymesopelagicprokaryotic community structure

Identifiers

PMID27818655
PMCPMC5073097
OpenAlexW2534032565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.