Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27818592›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Predicting malignant transformation of esophageal squamous cell lesions by combined biomarkers in an endoscopic screening program.

Hao Zhang, Hao Li, Qing Ma, Fang-Yan Yang, Tao-Yu Diao

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Signaling pathways and targeted interventions for precancers.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of precision imaging in esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hao ZhangHao Zhang, Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250132, Shandong Province, China.
Hao LiHao Zhang, Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250132, Shandong Province, China.
Qing MaHao Zhang, Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250132, Shandong Province, China.
Fang-Yan YangHao Zhang, Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250132, Shandong Province, China.
Tao-Yu DiaoHao Zhang, Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Hospital of Jinan, Jinan 250132, Shandong Province, China.
Fourth People’s Hospital of Jinan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo determine the association of p53, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA19-9 protein expression with esophageal carcinogenesis.

methodsAn iodine staining endoscopic screening program of esophageal lesions was carried out in the high-incidence area of Feicheng County, China. Seventy-seven patients with basal cell hyperplasia (BCH), 247 with low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 51 with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), 134 with invasive cancer, and 80 normal controls diagnosed by mucous membrane biopsy pathology were enrolled. Immunohistochemical detection of p53, CEA and CA19-9 proteins was performed. In the ROC curve analysis, the expression of a single biomarker and the expression of a combination of biomarkers were used to predict the risk of these four esophageal lesions.

resultsThe positive rates of p53 protein expression in invasive cancer, HGD, LGD, BCH and the normal control groups were 53.0%, 52.9%, 35.6%, 27.3% and 20.0%, respectively; the positive rates of CA19-9 protein expression were 44.0%, 33.3%, 16.5%, 9.2% and 6.2%, respectively; the positive rates of CEA protein expression were 74.6%, 60.8%, 23.3%, 23.7% and 16.2%, respectively. The positive rates of the combined expression of the three biomarkers were 84.3%, 76.5%, 47.6%, 42.9% and 27.5%, respectively. In the receiver operating characteristic curves of the combination of the three biomarkers, the specificity was 88.8% for the normal controls, and the sensitivity was 58.2% for invasive cancer, 25.5% for HGD, 11.2% for LGD, and 6.5% for BCH.

conclusionp53, CEA and CA19-9 protein expression was correlated with esophageal carcinogenesis, and testing for the combination of these biomarkers is useful for identifying high-risk patients with precancerous lesions.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorEarly Detection of CancerEndoscopyEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53CA19-9Carcinoembryonic antigenEsophageal squamous cell cancerEsophageal squamous cell dysplasiaImmunohistochemistryp53Prediction

Identifiers

PMID27818592
PMCPMC5075551
OpenAlexW2538256256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.