Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27818584›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided techniques for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Can we do better?

Andrew C Storm, Linda S Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with pancreatic cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  12. Protein Signatures and Tissue Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Impact of calcifications on diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew C StormAndrew C Storm, Linda S Lee, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.
Linda S LeeAndrew C Storm, Linda S Lee, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostic approach to a possible pancreatic mass lesion relies first upon various non-invasive imaging modalities, including computed tomography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Once a suspect lesion has been identified, tissue acquisition for characterization of the lesion is often paramount in developing an individualized therapeutic approach. Given the high prevalence and mortality associated with pancreatic cancer, an ideal approach to diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions would be safe, highly sensitive, and reproducible across various practice settings. Tools, in addition to radiologic imaging, currently employed in the initial evaluation of a patient with a pancreatic mass lesion include serum tumor markers, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). EUS-FNA has grown to become the gold standard in tissue diagnosis of pancreatic lesions.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationEndoscopyEndosonographyEvidence-Based MedicineHemorrhageHumansInfectionsNeoplasm StagingPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitisPrevalenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyEndoscopic ultrasoundEndoscopyFine needle aspirationPancreatic cancerPancreatic mass

Identifiers

PMID27818584
PMCPMC5075543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.