Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27818375›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of epidemiology2017

Time-discounting and tobacco smoking: a systematic review and network analysis.

Pepita Barlow, Martin McKee, Aaron Reeves, Gauden Galea, David Stuckler

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Differential Responses to Cigarette Package Labeling Alternatives Among Adults Who Smoke: Results From a Randomized Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Associations Between Self-Reported Sleep Quality, Fatigue Severity, Factors Associated With Successful Cessation, and Cessation Beliefs Among Regular Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Smoking Dependence, Time-Discounting, and Sustained Cessation Behavior: A Longitudinal Study of Predominantly Light Smokers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pepita BarlowDepartment of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Martin McKeeDepartment of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Aaron ReevesInternational Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics, London, UK.
Gauden GaleaDivision of Noncommunicable Diseases and Life-course, Regional Office for Europe, World Health OrganizationCopenhagen, Denmark.
David StucklerDepartment of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DK

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tobacco smoking harms health, so why do people smoke and fail to quit? An explanation originating in behavioural economics suggests a role for time-discounting, which describes how the value of a reward, such as better health, decreases with delay to its receipt. A large number of studies test the relationship of time-discounting with tobacco outcomes but the temporal pattern of this relationship and its variation according to measurement methods remain unclear. We review the association between time-discounting and smoking across (i) the life course, from initiation to cessation, and (ii) diverse discount measures. Methods: We identified 69 relevant studies in Web of Science and PubMed. We synthesized findings across methodologies and evaluated discount measures, study quality and cross-disciplinary fertilization. Results: In 44 out of 54 studies, smokers more greatly discounted the future than non-smokers and, in longitudinal studies, higher discounting predicted future smoking. Smokers with lower time-discount rates achieved higher quit rates. Findings were consistent across studies measuring discount rates using hypothetical monetary or cigarette reward scenarios. The methodological quality of the majority of studies was rated as 'moderate' and co-citation analysis revealed an isolation of economics journals and a dearth of studies in public health. Conclusion: There is moderate yet consistent evidence that high time-discounting is a risk factor for smoking and unsuccessful cessation. Policy scenarios assuming a flat rate of population discounting may inadequately capture smokers' perceptions of costs and benefits.

Indexed as

Delay DiscountingHealth PolicyHumansRisk FactorsSmokingSmoking Cessationcessationsmokingtime-discountingtime preference

Identifiers

PMID27818375
PMCPMC5637946
OpenAlexW2547666927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.