Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27818250›Full record

ReviewExperimental gerontology2017

A novel mechanism of non-feminizing estrogens in neuroprotection.

Elizabeth B Engler-Chiurazzi, Douglas F Covey, James W Simpkins

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental gerontology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Sex as a Determinant of Age-Related Changes in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Neurosteroid enantiomers as potentially novel neurotherapeutics.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth B Engler-ChiurazziCenter for Basic and Translational Stroke Research, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, United States. Electronic address: elengler@hsc.wvu.edu.
Douglas F CoveyDepartment of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.
James W SimpkinsCenter for Basic and Translational Stroke Research, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, United States.
West Virginia University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
West Virginia University Stroke COBREP20GM109098 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI DEVRIES, ANNE COURTNEY · 2014 to 2024
$24.5M
Protein Targets of Oxidative Brain AgingP01AG022550 · NIA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI DILLION, GLENN · 2003 to 2013
$15.7M
ROLE OF MITHOCHONDRIAL ERB IN NEURONAL VULNDERABILITY TO NEUROTOXIC STRESSP01AG027956 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI SINGH, MEHARVAN · 2007 to 2017
$11.3M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG022550NIA NIH HHS P01 AG027956NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109098NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogens are potent and efficacious neuroprotectants both in vitro and in vivo in a variety of models of neurotoxicity. We determined the structural requirements for neuroprotection in an in vitro assay using a panel of >70 novel estratrienes, synthesized to reduce or eliminate estrogen receptor (ER) binding. We observed that neuroprotection could be enhanced by as much as 200-fold through modifications that positioned a large bulky group at the C2 or C4 position of the phenolic A ring of the estratriene. Further, substitutions on the B, C or D rings either reduced or did not markedly change neuroprotection. Collectively, there was a negative correlation between binding to ERs and neuroprotection with the more potent compounds showing no ER binding. In an in vivo model for neuroprotection, transient cerebral ischemia, efficacious compounds were active in protection of brain tissue from this pro-oxidant insult. We demonstrated that these non-feminizing estrogens engage in a redox cycle with glutathione, using the hexose monophosphate shunt to apply cytosolic reducing potential to cellular membranes. Together, these results demonstrate that non-feminizing estrogens are neuroprotective and protect brain from the induction of ischemic- and Alzheimer's disease (AD)-like neuropathology in an animal model. These features of non-feminizing estrogens make them attractive compounds for assessment of efficacy in AD and stroke, as they are not expected to show the side effects of chronic estrogen therapy that are mediated by ER actions in the liver, uterus and breast.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainEstradiolEstriolEstrogensHumansMolecular StructureNeuronsNeuroprotective AgentsOxidation-ReductionOxidative StressReceptors, EstrogenStructure-Activity RelationshipEstradiolEstriolEstrogensNeuroprotective AgentsReceptors, EstrogenEstradiolEstrogensNon-feminizing estrogensRedox cyclingStructure-activity relationships

Identifiers

PMID27818250
PMCPMC5415429
OpenAlexW2548202306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.