Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27818094›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]

Comparative study of Mycobacterium bovis primary isolation methods.

Marina de Azevedo Issa, Paulo Martins Soares Filho, Antônio Augusto Fonseca Júnior, Mikael Arrais Hodon, Lílian Cristian Dos Santos, Jenner Karlisson Pimenta Dos Reis, Rômulo Cerqueira Leite

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Multispacer Sequence Typing forFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  6. Veterinary world · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina de Azevedo IssaLaboratório Nacional Agropecuário de Minas Gerais, Pedro Leopoldo, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: marinaissa@yahoo.com.br.
Paulo Martins Soares FilhoLaboratório Nacional Agropecuário de Minas Gerais, Pedro Leopoldo, MG, Brazil.
Antônio Augusto Fonseca JúniorLaboratório Nacional Agropecuário de Minas Gerais, Pedro Leopoldo, MG, Brazil.
Mikael Arrais HodonLaboratório Nacional Agropecuário de Minas Gerais, Pedro Leopoldo, MG, Brazil.
Lílian Cristian Dos SantosLaboratório Nacional Agropecuário de Minas Gerais, Pedro Leopoldo, MG, Brazil.
Jenner Karlisson Pimenta Dos ReisUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Rômulo Cerqueira LeiteUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the definitive diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis, isolation of the etiologic agent is required. However, there is no consensus on the best methodology for isolation of Mycobacterium bovis in Brazil. This study evaluated the most used decontaminants and culture media in the country, in order to identify the best combination for the Brazilian samples. Three decontaminants - 2% sodium hydroxide (w/v), 0.75% hexadecylpiridinium chloride (w/v) and 5% sulphuric acid (v/v) and four culture media - 7H11 Middlebrook with additives and OADC supplement "A" (7H11 A), the same media with another supplement trademark (7H11 B), tuberculosis blood agar (B83) and Stonebrink's medium were compared. Regarding the isolation, there were no significant differences between the decontaminants and media combinations, except 7H11A combined to any decontaminant. However, the mean colonies score was significantly greater when the samples were decontaminated with 5% sulphuric acid and inoculated in 7H11 B or SB, without significant difference between them, although colonies appeared earlier on 7H11B than on SB. The trademark of OADC supplement influenced the isolation rate and the number of isolated colonies in Middlebrook 7H11. An incubation time of four weeks was required to detect all positive samples in 7H11 B after decontamination with 5% sulphuric acid but there was an increase in the number of colonies until the sixth week of incubation. Overall, the best strategy for the primary isolation of M. bovis from Brazilian samples was the decontamination with 5% sulphuric acid (final concentration) and inoculation in Middlebrook 7H11 medium formulated with OADC supplement "B".

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriological TechniquesCattleMycobacterium bovisTuberculosis, BovineDiagnosisIsolationMiddlebrook 7H11Mycobacterium bovisSulphuric acid

Identifiers

PMID27818094
PMCPMC5220631
OpenAlexW2531163110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.