Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27818090›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2016

Ethanol production in Brazil: a bridge between science and industry.

Mario Lucio Lopes, Silene Cristina de Lima Paulillo, Alexandre Godoy, Rudimar Antonio Cherubin, Marcel Salmeron Lorenzi, Fernando Henrique Carvalho Giometti, Claudemir Domingues Bernardino, Henrique Berbert de Amorim Neto, Henrique Vianna de Amorim

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 399 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Multilayered defense responses in sugarcane againstFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ImprovingHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mario Lucio LopesFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: mario@fermentec.com.br.
Silene Cristina de Lima PaulilloFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre GodoyFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rudimar Antonio CherubinFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcel Salmeron LorenziFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fernando Henrique Carvalho GiomettiFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Claudemir Domingues BernardinoFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Henrique Berbert de Amorim NetoFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Henrique Vianna de AmorimFermentec, Piracicaba, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fermentec (Brazil) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last 40 years, several scientific and technological advances in microbiology of the fermentation have greatly contributed to evolution of the ethanol industry in Brazil. These contributions have increased our view and comprehension about fermentations in the first and, more recently, second-generation ethanol. Nowadays, new technologies are available to produce ethanol from sugarcane, corn and other feedstocks, reducing the off-season period. Better control of fermentation conditions can reduce the stress conditions for yeast cells and contamination by bacteria and wild yeasts. There are great research opportunities in production processes of the first-generation ethanol regarding high-value added products, cost reduction and selection of new industrial yeast strains that are more robust and customized for each distillery. New technologies have also focused on the reduction of vinasse volumes by increasing the ethanol concentrations in wine during fermentation. Moreover, conversion of sugarcane biomass into fermentable sugars for second-generation ethanol production is a promising alternative to meet future demands of biofuel production in the country. However, building a bridge between science and industry requires investments in research, development and transfer of new technologies to the industry as well as specialized personnel to deal with new technological challenges.

Indexed as

EthanolFermentationBiofuelsBrazilHumansIndustrial MicrobiologyScienceTechnologyYeastsBiofuelsEthanolDistilleryEthanolFermentationYeast

Identifiers

PMID27818090
PMCPMC5156502
OpenAlexW2533485576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.