ArticleBMC medicine2016
It's a long shot, but it just might work! Perspectives on the future of medicine.
Article in BMC medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Where are the chiropractic clinical outcomes registries? A scoping review.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2025Article
- Patients' Utilization and Perception of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Symptom Assessment and Advice Technology in a British Primary Care Waiting Room: Exploratory Pilot Study.JMIR human factors · 2020Article
- Patients' Measurement Priorities for Remote Measurement Technologies to Aid Chronic Health Conditions: Qualitative Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Characteristics of Future Models of Integrated Outpatient Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Quality in practice: implementation of a clinical outcomes registry in regenerative medicine.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With mHealth Technology for Remote Measurement and Management of Depression: Qualitative Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Public health application of predictive modeling: an example from farm vehicle crashes.Injury epidemiology · 2019Article
- Patients' views of wearable devices and AI in healthcare: findings from the ComPaRe e-cohort.NPJ digital medicine · 2019Article
- A Rapid Process for Identifying and Prioritizing Technology-Based Tools for Health System Implementation.JMIR cancer · 2018Article
- Estimating classification consistency of machine learning models for screening measures.Psychological assessmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
What does the future of medicine hold? We asked six researchers to share their most ambitious and optimistic views of the future, grounded in the present but looking out a decade or more from now to consider what's possible. They paint a picture of a connected and data-driven world in which patient value, patient feedback, and patient empowerment shape a continually learning system that ensures each patient's experience contributes to the improved outcome of every patient like them, whether it be through clinical trials, data from consumer devices, hacking their medical devices, or defining value in thoughtful new ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.