Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27817158›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

A PET/MRI study towards finding the optimal [

Mattijs Elschot, Kirsten M Selnæs, Elise Sandsmark, Brage Krüger-Stokke, Øystein Størkersen, May-Britt Tessem, Siver A Moestue, Helena Bertilsson, Tone F Bathen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02076503 (Pre-operative PET-MR of High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients for Assessment of Cancer Aggressiveness and Lymph Node Status), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02076503 nacompletednot on this map

Pre-operative PET-MR of High Risk Prostate Cancer Patients for Assessment of Cancer Aggressiveness and Lymph Node Status

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Olavs HospitalRan2014 to 2015Enrolled28ConditionsProstatic NeoplasmsArmsPET-MR 18f-FACBC, histology (gold standard)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Utility ofAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021
    Article
  5. The Role of [Cancers · 2021
    Article
  6. Value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. European radiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Comparison of time curves from dynamicPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2018
    Article
  10. Update onJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Review
  11. SimultaneousFrontiers in oncology · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mattijs ElschotDeparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway. mattijs.elschot@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8056-9103
Kirsten M SelnæsDeparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Elise SandsmarkDeparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Brage Krüger-StokkeDeparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Øystein StørkersenDepartment of Pathology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
May-Britt TessemDeparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Siver A MoestueDeparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Helena BertilssonDepartment of Urology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Tone F BathenDeparment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Mail MTFS*3.1313, POBox 8905, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose[

methodsPatients diagnosed with high-risk primary prostate cancer underwent an integrated [

resultsTwenty-eight (28) patients [median (range) age: 66 (55-72) years] were included. An early (W1: 5-10 minutes post-injection) and two late candidate windows (W2: 18-23; W3: 33-38 minutes post-injection) were selected. Late compared with early imaging was better able to distinguish between malignant and benign tissue [W3, SUV

conclusionLate-window [

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAgedCarboxylic AcidsCyclobutanesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsSensitivity and SpecificityCarboxylic AcidsCyclobutanesfluciclovine F-18Radiopharmaceuticals[18F]FACBC[18F]FluciclovineDynamic PETPET/MRIProstate Cancer

Identifiers

PMID27817158
OpenAlexW2548689831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.