Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27817133›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2017

Simulator training to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory.

Aric Katz, Avraham Shtub, Amir Solomonica, Adva Poliakov, Ariel Roguin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Organ-based estimation and minimization of clinician's X-ray dose.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aric KatzDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Avraham ShtubDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Amir SolomonicaInterventional Cardiology, Rambam Medical Center, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, 31096, Haifa, Israel.
Adva PoliakovInterventional Cardiology, Rambam Medical Center, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, 31096, Haifa, Israel.
Ariel RoguinInterventional Cardiology, Rambam Medical Center, Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, 31096, Haifa, Israel. aroguin@technion.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4628-1840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To learn about radiation and how to lower it. Patients and operators are routinely exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation during catheterization procedures. This increased exposure to ionizing radiation is partially due to a lack of awareness to the effects of ionizing radiation, and lack of knowledge on the distribution and behavior of scattered radiation. A simulator, which incorporates data on scattered ionizing radiation, was built based on multiple phantom measurements and used for teaching radiation safety. The validity of the simulator was confirmed in three catheterization laboratories and tested by 20 interventional cardiologists. All evaluators were tested by an objective knowledge examination before, immediately following, and 12 weeks after simulator-based learning and training. A subjective Likert questionnaire on satisfaction with simulation-based learning and training was also completed. The 20 evaluators learned and retained the knowledge that they gained from using the simulator: the average scores of the knowledge examination pre-simulator training was 54 ± 15% (mean ± standard deviation), and this score significantly increased after training to 94 ± 10% (p < 0.001). The evaluators also reported high levels of satisfaction following simulation-based learning and training according to the results of the subjective Likert questionnaire. Simulators can be used to train cardiology staff and fellows and to further educate experienced personnel on radiation safety. As a result of simulator training, the operator gains knowledge, which can then be applied in the catheterization laboratory in order to reduce radiation doses to the patient and to the operator, thereby improving the safety of the intervention.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationRadiation DosageAttitude of Health PersonnelCardiac CatheterizationCardiologistsClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, ContinuingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInservice TrainingLearningOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthOccupational InjuriesPatient SafetyRadiation ExposureCardiac catheterizationEducationRadiation exposureSafetySimulationTraining

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.