Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27816781›Full record

ArticleBrain and cognition2017

Relationships among attention networks and physiological responding to threat.

Casey Sarapas, Anna Weinberg, Scott A Langenecker, Stewart A Shankman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. How many blinks are necessary for a reliable startle response? A test using the NPU-threat task.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Casey SarapasDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60607, United States. Electronic address: csarapas@challiance.org.
Anna WeinbergDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60607, United States. Electronic address: anna.weinberg@mcgill.ca.
Scott A LangeneckerDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60607, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 S. Wood St., Chicago, IL 60612, United States. Electronic address: slangenecker@psych.uic.edu.
Stewart A ShankmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1007 W. Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60607, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 S. Wood St., Chicago, IL 60612, United States. Electronic address: stewarts@uic.edu.

Funding

Family Study of Reward and Threat Sensitivity in Internalizing PsychopathologyR01MH098093 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SHANKMAN, STEWART AARON · 2012 to 2015
$2.7M
Patterns and mediators of emotion regulatory disturbance in panic disorderF31MH100823 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI SARAPAS, CASEY · 2013 to 2016
$96k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH100823NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although researchers have long hypothesized a relationship between attention and anxiety, theoretical and empirical accounts of this relationship have conflicted. We attempted to resolve these conflicts by examining relationships of attentional abilities with responding to predictable and unpredictable threat - related but distinct motivational process implicated in a number of anxiety disorders. Eighty-one individuals completed a behavioral task assessing efficiency of three components of attention - alerting, orienting, and executive control (Attention Network Test - Revised). We also assessed startle responding during anticipation of both predictable, imminent threat (of mild electric shock) and unpredictable contextual threat. Faster alerting and slower disengaging from non-emotional attention cues were related to heightened responding to unpredictable threat, whereas poorer executive control of attention was related to heightened responding to predictable threat. This double dissociation helps to integrate models of attention and anxiety and may be informative for treatment development.

Indexed as

AdultAnticipation, PsychologicalAnxietyAttentionExecutive FunctionFearFemaleHumansMaleReflex, StartleYoung AdultAnxietyAttentionCognitionExecutive functioningFearPredictabilityStartle

Identifiers

PMID27816781
PMCPMC5209251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.