ReviewTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2017
Advances in imaging approaches to fracture risk evaluation.
Review in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fragility fracture risk prediction using quantitative magnetic resonance and Vertebral Bone Quality scoring beyond density.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Intraoperative mechanical characterization of vertebral bone quality during percutaneous kyphoplasty.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring osteomicrobiology: A narrative review of the gut-bone axis in osteoporosis.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Review
- Article
- Review
- Estimation of Trabecular Bone Volume with Dual-Echo Ultrashort Echo Time (UTE) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Significantly Correlates with High-Resolution Computed Tomography (CT).Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Bone health: Quality versus quantity.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024Article
- Bone Biomarkers Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology · 2024Review
- Assessment of spatially offset Raman spectroscopy to detect differences in bone matrix quality.Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy · 2023Article
- Computer Vision in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture Risk Prediction: A Systematic Review.Neurospine · 2023Article
- Article
- A Deep Learning-Based Model for Classifying Osteoporotic Lumbar Vertebral Fractures on Radiographs: A Retrospective Model Development and Validation Study.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Prenatal and Neonatal Bone Health: Updated Review on Early Identification of Newborns at High Risk for Osteopenia.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Finite element analysis of bone mechanical properties using MRI-derived bound and pore water concentration maps.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- TNMR in biomedicine · 2023Article
- Effect of ribose incubation on physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of human cortical bone.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2023Article
- Article
- MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Review
- Identifying Bone Matrix Impairments in a Mouse Model of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) by Clinically Translatable Techniques.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fragility fractures are a growing problem worldwide, and current methods for diagnosing osteoporosis do not always identify individuals who require treatment to prevent a fracture and may misidentify those not a risk. Traditionally, fracture risk is assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, which provides measurements of areal bone mineral density at sites prone to fracture. Recent advances in imaging show promise in adding new information that could improve the prediction of fracture risk in the clinic. As reviewed herein, advances in quantitative computed tomography (QCT) predict hip and vertebral body strength; high-resolution HR-peripheral QCT (HR-pQCT) and micromagnetic resonance imaging assess the microarchitecture of trabecular bone; quantitative ultrasound measures the modulus or tissue stiffness of cortical bone; and quantitative ultrashort echo-time MRI methods quantify the concentrations of bound water and pore water in cortical bone, which reflect a variety of mechanical properties of bone. Each of these technologies provides unique characteristics of bone and may improve fracture risk diagnoses and reduce prevalence of fractures by helping to guide treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.