ArticleFertility and sterility2017
Distribution of the FMR1 gene in females by race/ethnicity: women with diminished ovarian reserve versus women with normal fertility (SWAN study).
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does theFMR1 gene affect IVF success?Reproductive biomedicine online · 2019Pooled it
- From Genes to Lives: Integrating the Complexities of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Genetic Landscape of a Cohort of 120 Patients with Diminished Ovarian Reserve: Correlation with Infertility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Prevalence of theGenes · 2024Article
- Genetic determination of the ovarian reserve: a literature review.Journal of ovarian research · 2021Review
- The significance of FMR1 CGG repeats in Chinese women with premature ovarian insufficiency and diminished ovarian reserve.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020Article
- FMR1 expression in human granulosa cells increases with exon 1 CGG repeat length depending on ovarian reserve.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2018Article
- Reproductive ovarian testing and the alphabet soup of diagnoses: DOR, POI, POF, POR, and FOR.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Review
- Fragile X-Associated Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Primary Ovarian Insufficiency from Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Manifestations.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017Review
- Low normal FMR1 genotype in older adult women: Psychological well-being and motor function.Archives of gerontology and geriatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo study whether reported, but inconsistent, associations between the FMR1 CGG repeat lengths in the intermediate, high normal, or low normal range differentiate women diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) from population controls and whether associations vary by race/ethnic group.
designCase-control study.
settingAcademic and private fertility clinics. PATIENT(S): DOR cases (n = 129; 95 Whites, 22 Asian, 12 other) from five U.S. fertility clinics were clinically diagnosed, with regular menses and no fragile X syndrome family history. Normal fertility controls (n = 803; 386 Whites, 219 African-Americans, 102 Japanese, 96 Chinese) from the United States-based SWAN Study had one or more menstrual period in the 3 months pre-enrollment, one or more pregnancy, no history of infertility or hormone therapy, and menopause ≥46 years. Previously, the SWAN Chinese and Japanese groups had similar FMR1 CGG repeat lengths, thus they were combined. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): FMR1 CGG repeat lengths. RESULT(S): Median CGG repeats were nearly identical by case/control group. DOR cases had fewer CGG repeats in the shorter FMR1 allele than controls among Whites, but this was not significant among Asians. White cases had fewer CGG repeats in the shorter allele than Asian cases. No significant differences were found in the high normal/intermediate range between cases and controls or by race/ethnic group within cases in the longer allele. CONCLUSION(S): This study refutes prior reports of an association between DOR and high normal/intermediate repeats and confirms an association between DOR and low normal repeats in Whites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.