Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27816058›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Assessment of human papillomavirus E6/E7 oncogene expression as cervical disease biomarker.

Nerea Fontecha, Miren Basaras, Silvia Hernáez, Daniel Andía, Ramón Cisterna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Potential Role of E4 Protein in Human Papillomavirus Screening: a ReviewAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2017
    Review
  16. The importance of combined HPV and CINtec® PLUS genotyping testing for p16 in women with cervical squamous cell carcinoma.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nerea FontechaDepartment of Immunology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Medicine and Odontology Faculty, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Sarriena auzoa, 48940, Leioa-Bizkaia, Spain.
Miren BasarasDepartment of Immunology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Medicine and Odontology Faculty, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Sarriena auzoa, 48940, Leioa-Bizkaia, Spain. miren.basaras@ehu.eus.
Silvia HernáezClinical Microbiology and Infection Control Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, 48013, Spain.
Daniel AndíaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, 48013, Spain.
Ramón CisternaDepartment of Immunology, Microbiology and Parasitology, Medicine and Odontology Faculty, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Sarriena auzoa, 48940, Leioa-Bizkaia, Spain.
University of the Basque Country · ESHospital de Basurto · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aims of this study were to detect HPV E6/E7 mRNA expression in women with high-risk genotypes (HPV-16, -18, -31, -33 and -45) analysing its relationship with tissue pathology and 2) 2-year follow-up of E6/E7 mRNA tested group.

methodsOur samples were genotyped and classified by pathologists according to Bethesda system. After RNA extraction, E6/E7 oncogene mRNA detection was performed by NucliSens® EasyQ® HPV v1 Test (bioMérieux).

resultsThe results of the present study showed that E6/E7 mRNA positivity rate was 68.29 % in women tested once and 69.56 % in women tested twice. According to tissue pathology, all samples with high-grade lesions were positive for mRNA. Among women with low-grade lesions varied over the years from 89.28 to 84 % in women tested once and from 77.77 to 70 % in tested twice. Among women without lesion, positivity rate maintained in women tested once (from 50 to 41.38 %) and decreased in tested twice, from 63.63 to 44.44 %. Regarding lesion evolution, mRNA positivity was higher in women with lesion progression (53.13 %) and in women with positive results in two tested samples (83.33 %).

conclusionHPV E6/E7 mRNA detection may be an effective screening test and biomarker for cervical cancer in women infected with these five genotypes. Nonetheless, further studies are needed to standardize as routine triage test.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene ExpressionHuman papillomavirus 16HumansMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, ViralOncogenesPapillomavirus E7 ProteinsPapillomavirus InfectionsRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, ViralSquamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the CervixBiomarkers, TumorE6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16oncogene protein E7, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus E7 ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA, ViralBiomarkerE6/E7 mRNA detectionHigh-risk HPV genotypesOncogenesPrognosis marker

Identifiers

PMID27816058
PMCPMC5097850
OpenAlexW2546514719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.