Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27815834›Full record

ArticleMolecular neurobiology2017

Preventing Emergence Agitation Using Ancillary Drugs with Sevoflurane for Pediatric Anesthesia: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Xin Wang, Qi Deng, Bin Liu, Xiangdi Yu

Abstract readNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550002, China.
Qi DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainanguoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Bin LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Wainanguoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China. wcw_tmmu@yeah.net.
Xiangdi YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, 550002, China.
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Plan QKHLH[2015]7142Youth Foundation of Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital GZSYQN[2015]09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using sevoflurane for pediatric anesthesia plays a pivotal role in surgeries. Emergence agitation (EA) is a major adverse event accompanied with pediatric anesthesia. Other anesthetic adjuvants can be combined with sevoflurane in clinical practices for different purposes. However, it is uncertain that such a practice may have substantial influence on the risk of EA. We conducted a literature search in online databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials. Key data were extracted from eligible randomized control trials (RCTs). Both pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted for synthesizing data from eligible studies. The relative risk of EA was assessed using the odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) or credible intervals (CrI). Ranking scheme based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values was produced. Several key assumptions of NMA such as heterogeneity, degree of consistence, and publication bias were validated by different statistical or graphical approaches. Evidence from 67 randomized control trials was synthesized. The relative risk of EA associated with eight anesthetic adjuvants was analyzed, including ketamine, propofol, dexmedetomidine, clonidine, midazolam, fentanyl, remifentanil, and sufentanil. Patients with the following anesthetic adjuvants appeared to have significantly reduced risk of EA in relation to those with placebo: dexmedetomidine (OR = 0.18, 95 % CrI 0.12-0.25), fentanyl (OR = 0.19, 95 % CrI 0.12-0.30), sufentanil (OR = 0.20, 95 % CrI 0.08-0.50), ketamine (OR = 0.21, 95 % CrI 0.13-0.34), clonidine (OR = 0.25, 95 % CrI 0.14-0.46), propofol (OR = 0.32, 95 % CrI 0.18-0.56), midazolam (OR = 0.46, 95 % CrI 0.27-0.77), and remifentanil (OR = 0.29, 95 % CrI 0.13-0.68). The SUCRA values for each anesthetic adjuvant were: dexmedetomidine (73.65 %), fentanyl (68.04 %), sufentanil (60.81 %), ketamine (59.99 %), clonidine (47.74 %), remifentanil (40.15 %), propofol (33.23 %), midazolam (16.33 %), and placebo (0.06 %). Incorporating anesthetic adjuvants particularly dexmedetomidine into sevoflurane appeared to be significantly associated with a decreased risk of EA in pediatric anesthesia.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, InhalationChildDrug Therapy, CombinationEmergence DeliriumHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSevofluraneAnesthetics, InhalationSevofluraneAnesthetic adjuvantClonidineDexmedetomidineEmergency agitationFentanylKetamineMidazolamNetwork meta-analysisPediatric anesthesiaPropofolRemifentanilSevofluraneSufentanil

Identifiers

PMID27815834
OpenAlexW2546464541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.