ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04013152 (French Prospective Clinical Database of Colorectal Robotic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
French Prospective Clinical Database of Colorectal Robotic Surgery
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic surgery for Crohn's disease: educational value and quality of online video resources.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Learning curve for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer - a systematic review of literature.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Pooled it
- Skill transference and learning curves in novice learners: a randomized comparison of robotic and laparoscopic platforms.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Operative workflow characterization of the Hugo robotic-assisted surgery and da Vinci Multiport systems in left-sided colorectal surgery: a single-institution pilot analysis.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
- Structured robotic colorectal training in a non-tertiary NHS hospital: a 502-case consecutive cohort implementation study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Economic transition during robotic colorectal surgery implementation: reduced device costs and improved gross profit per hospital day.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Association of institutional volume with surgical and oncologic outcomes for robotic rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective review.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Safe Implementation of Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Balancing Surgical Training and Patient Safety with the Dual-Console System.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis and development of the learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery at a specialized center.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Observational
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for IBD: a case-matched comparison during the learning curve.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of proctoring on the learning curve of robotic-assisted low anterior resection: a multicenter retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment in 2026: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Age disparity in robotic colorectal surgery: overcoming surgeon hesitancy to improve elderly patient outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Surgeon- and procedure-specific variability in operative-time learning curves during parallel implementation of robotic colorectal surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Learning curve analysis for prophylactic bilateral robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Initiation of a robotic pancreatoduodenectomy program using virtual collaboration.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024Article
- Learning Curve for Robotic Colorectal Surgery.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceRobotic colorectal resection continues to gain in popularity. However, limited data are available regarding how surgeons gain competency and institutions develop programs.
objectiveTo determine the number of cases required for establishing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program.
designRetrospective review.
settingCancer center. PATIENTS: We reviewed 418 robotic-assisted resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, by surgeons at a single institution. The individual surgeon's and institutional learning curve were examined. The earliest adopter, Surgeon 1, had the highest volume. Surgeons 2-4 were later adopters. Surgeon 5 joined the group with robotic experience.
interventionsA cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) was used to construct learning curves and define the number of cases required for the initial learning phase. Perioperative variables were analyzed across learning phases.
main outcome measureCase numbers for each stage of the learning curve.
resultsThe earliest adopter, Surgeon 1, performed 203 cases. CUSUM analysis of surgeons' experience defined three learning phases, the first requiring 74 cases. Later adopters required 23-30 cases for their initial learning phase. For Surgeon 1, operative time decreased from 250 to 213.6 min from phase 1-3 (P = 0.008), with no significant changes in intraoperative complication or leak rate. For Surgeons 2-4, operative time decreased from 418 to 361.9 min across the two phases (P = 0.004). Their intraoperative complication rate decreased from 7.8 to 0 % (P = 0.03); the leak rate was not significantly different (9.1 vs. 1.5 %, P = 0.07), though it may be underpowered given the small number of events.
conclusionsOur data suggest that establishing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program requires approximately 75 cases. Once a program is well established, the learning curve is shorter and surgeons require fewer cases (25-30) to reach proficiency. These data suggest that the institutional learning curve extends beyond a single surgeon's learning experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.