Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27815712›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Emergency oncology: development, current position and future direction in the USA and UK.

Tim Cooksley, Terry Rice

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Febrile neutropenia in patients treated with chemotherapy/immune checkpoint inhibition: a MASCC consensus statement.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Mixed methods scoping review of patients' experiences of urgent and emergency cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Low-risk febrile neutropenia: does combined chemotherapy/immune checkpoint inhibitor necessitate a change in approach?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk stratification for clinical severity of pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer: a narrative review and MASCC clinical guidance for daily care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2021
    Article
  14. Supportive Care: An Indispensable Component of Modern Oncology.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Emergency ambulatory outpatient management of immune-mediated hypophysitis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  17. Do mHealth applications improve clinical outcomes of patients with cancer? A critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Review
  18. Emergency admissions and subsequent inpatient care through an emergency oncology service at a tertiary cancer centre: service users' experiences and views.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  19. Validation of the EPIPHANY index for predicting risk of serious complications in cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolism.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Observational
  20. A novel approach to improving ambulatory outpatient management of low risk febrile neutropenia: an Enhanced Supportive Care (ESC) clinic.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim CooksleyDepartment of Acute Medicine and Critical Care, The Christie, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, UK. cooks199@hotmail.com.
Terry RiceDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The need for supportive and palliative care services in patients with cancer is well established. However, the emerging unique challenges of acutely unwell patients with cancer necessitate the need for research into the optimal strategies and pathways for their management. The clinical challenges of emergency oncology alongside its increasing financial burden have led to an interest as to the best strategies for delivering this care. In the USA and UK, varying models of emergency and acute care are developing. There is a clear need for non-oncology physicians with an interest in the management of oncological emergencies to be at the heart of this work. This paper considers the current situation in the USA and UK and the future directions for the delivery of this care.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicineHumansMedical OncologyUnited KingdomUnited StatesAcute oncologyChemotherapyEmergency oncologyOncologic emergenciesToxicities

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.