ArticleCancer research2017
Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy Measures Vascular Pore Size in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors.
Article in Cancer research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Shows Size-dependent Focused Ultrasound-mediated Therapeutic Delivery to Naive Brain and Gliomas in Mice.Radiology · 2026Article
- Focused ultrasound for brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Generalizable, high-throughput image analysis of subcellular structures using dispersion indices.iScience · 2026Article
- Breast cancer brain metastasis: from molecular insights to therapeutic innovation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- LRP1 in vascular mural cells modulates cerebrovascular integrity and function in the presence of APOE4.JCI insight · 2023Article
- Effects of whole-brain radiation therapy on the blood-brain barrier in immunocompetent and immunocompromised mouse models.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Article
- Blood-tumor barrier opening by MRI-guided transcranial focused ultrasound in a preclinical breast cancer brain metastasis model improves efficacy of combinatorial chemotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Mouse Strain- and Charge-Dependent Vessel Permeability of Nanoparticles at the Lower Size Limit.Frontiers in chemistry · 2022Article
- Immune response pathways enriched in breast cancer samples with brain metastasis.Gland surgery · 2021Article
- Modulation of the blood-tumor barrier to enhance drug delivery and efficacy for brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advances · 2021Article
- The blood-tumour barrier in cancer biology and therapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2021Review
- Ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood tumor barrier for improved therapeutic delivery.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- Blood-Brain Barrier Modulation to Improve Glioma Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Brain tumor vessels-a barrier for drug delivery.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2020Review
- Drug resistance occurred in a newly characterized preclinical model of lung cancer brain metastasis.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Nanoparticles Containing a Combination of a Drug and an Antibody for the Treatment of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Bevacizumab suppresses the growth of established non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastases in a hematogenous brain metastasis model.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2020Article
- Intracranial glioma xenograft model rapidly reestablishes blood-brain barrier integrity for longitudinal imaging of tumor progression using fluorescence molecular tomography and contrast agents.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
- Improving CNS Delivery to Brain Metastases by Blood-Tumor Barrier Disruption.Trends in cancer · 2019Review
- A Blazing Landscape: Neuroinflammation Shapes Brain Metastasis.Cancer research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tumors residing in the central nervous system (CNS) compromise the blood-brain barrier (BBB) via increased vascular permeability, with the magnitude of changes dependent on the tumor type and location. Current studies determine penetrability of a cancer therapeutic by administering progressively larger molecules until cutoff is observed where little to no tumor accumulation occurs. However, decades-old experimental work and mathematical modeling document methods to calculate both the size of the vascular opening (pore) with solute permeability values. In this study, we updated this classic mathematical modeling approach with quantitative fluorescence microscopy in two preclinical tumor models, allowing simultaneous administration of multiple sized tracers to determine vascular permeability at a resolution of nearly one micron. We observed that three molecules ranging from 100 Da to 70 kDa permeated into a preclinical glioblastoma model at rates proportional to their diffusion in water. This suggests the solutes freely diffused from blood to glioma across vascular pores without steric restriction, which calculates to a pore size of >140 nm in diameter. In contrast, the calculated pore size of a brain metastasis of breast cancer was approximately 10-fold smaller than glioma vasculature. This difference explains why antibodies are effective against glioblastoma but generally fail in brain metastases of breast cancer. On the basis of our observations, we hypothesize that trastuzumab most likely fails in the treatment of brain metastases of breast cancer because of poor CNS penetration, while the similar sized antibody bevacizumab is effective in the same tumor type not because it penetrates the CNS degree better, but because it scavenges VEGF in the vascular compartment, which reduces edema and permeation. Cancer Res; 77(2); 238-46. ©2016 AACR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.