Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27814758›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2016

Temporal trends in the risk of developing multiple primary cancers: a systematic review.

Yuanzi Ye, Amanda L Neil, Karen E Wills, Alison J Venn

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Population-based risk assessment of second primary cancers following a first head and neck cancer: patterns of association and difficulties of its analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A case of multiple myeloma and synchronous liposarcoma.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuanzi YeMenzies Institute for Medical Research, Univeristy of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0025-8434
Amanda L NeilMenzies Institute for Medical Research, Univeristy of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia.
Karen E WillsMenzies Institute for Medical Research, Univeristy of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia.
Alison J VennMenzies Institute for Medical Research, Univeristy of Tasmania, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tasmania, 7000, Australia. Alison.Venn@utas.edu.au.
Menzies Institute for Medical ResearchUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer survivors are at risk of developing second and subsequent primary cancers, referred to as multiple primary cancers (MPCs). It is not clear whether the risk of MPCs has increased over recent decades, but increasing use of radiological imaging and potentially harmful effects of certain cancer treatments raise this possibility. A systematic review was undertaken to assess whether there has been a temporal change in the risk of developing MPCs.

methodsA systematic search to identify population-based studies of MPCs was performed in Medline/PubMed and Embase databases from inception to August 2016. Included studies were those reporting risk of MPCs for all sites combined following a first cancer at any site or a specific site, using standard incidence ratios (SIRs) or equivalent, and with analysis stratified by calendar years.

resultsWe identified 28 articles eligible for inclusion, comprising 26 population-based studies and two monographs. MPC incidence was reported in nearly 6.5 million cancer survivors. For all first cancer sites combined, a higher rate of MPCs was reported in more recent than earlier calendar periods in four of the six relevant studies. The SIRs ranged from 1.14 for a first cancer diagnosis in the early 1980s to 1.21-1.46 in the late 1990s in the USA and Australia. Two studies from Italy and France showed no significant difference in SIRs across time periods 1978-2010 and 1989-2004. The remaining 22 studies reported various temporal trends in the risk of developing MPCs after a first cancer at a specific site, but most showed little change.

conclusionOverall, the risk of developing MPCs appears to have increased since the 1980s when considering studies of all primary cancer sites combined from the USA and Australia but not from Europe. With the introduction of more routine nuclear medical imaging over the last 15 years, more studies are needed to confirm recent trends of MPC risk in adult cancer survivors.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryNeoplasms, Second PrimaryPopulation SurveillanceRiskSEER ProgramSpatio-Temporal AnalysisSurvivorsMultiple Primary CancersRiskSystematic reviewTrends

Identifiers

PMID27814758
PMCPMC5097442
OpenAlexW2547520083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.