Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27814729›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2016

Assessment of the scope and practice of evaluation among medical donation programs.

Alisa M Jenny, Meng Li, Elizabeth Ashbourne, Myron Aldrink, Christine Funk, Andy Stergachis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Medical Equipment Donation: An End in Itself or a Mean to an End?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alisa M JennyDepartment of Global Health, Global Medicines Program, University of Washington, Harris Hydraulics Building, Room 321, 1705 NE Pacific St., Box 357965, Seattle, WA, 98195-7965, USA. ajenny@uw.edu.
Meng LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth AshbournePartnership for Quality Medical Donations, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Myron AldrinkPacific Links LLC, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Christine FunkMerck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Andy StergachisDepartment of Global Health, Global Medicines Program, University of Washington, Harris Hydraulics Building, Room 321, 1705 NE Pacific St., Box 357965, Seattle, WA, 98195-7965, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical donation programs for drugs, other medical products, training and other supportive services can improve access to essential medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and provide emergency and disaster relief. The scope and extent to which medical donation programs evaluate their impact on recipients and health systems is not well documented.

methodsWe conducted a survey of the member organizations of the Partnership for Quality Medical Donations (PQMD), a global alliance of non-profit and corporate organizations, to identify evaluations conducted in conjunction with donation programs.

resultsTwenty-five out of the 36 PQMD organizations that were members at the time of the survey participated in the study, for a response rate of 69 %. PQMD members provided information on 34 of their major medical donation programs. Half of the donation programs reported conducting trainings as a part of their donation program. Twenty-six (76 %) programs reported that they conduct routine monitoring of their donation programs. Less than 30 % of donation programs were evaluated for their impact on health. Lack of technical staff and lack of funding were reported as key barriers to conducting impact evaluations.

conclusionsMember organizations of PQMD provide a broad range of medical donations, targeting a wide range of public health issues and events. While some level of monitoring and evaluation was conducted in nearly 80 % of the donation programs, a program's impact was infrequently evaluated. Opportunities exist to develop consistent metrics for medical donation programs, develop a common framework for impact evaluations, and advocate for data collection and analysis plans that collect meaningful metrics.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorFinancial SupportDeveloping CountriesEquipment and SuppliesHumansPrivate SectorProgram EvaluationSurveys and QuestionnairesEvaluationImpactLow- and Middle-Income CountriesMedical DonationsMonitoringNeglected Tropical Diseases

Identifiers

PMID27814729
PMCPMC5096304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.