Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27814692›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

A set of genes conserved in sequence and expression traces back the establishment of multicellularity in social amoebae.

Christina Schilde, Hajara M Lawal, Angelika A Noegel, Ludwig Eichinger, Pauline Schaap, Gernot Glöckner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcriptional milestones inGenome research · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Species recognition in social amoebae.Journal of biosciences · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina SchildeDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, DD15EH, Dundee, UK.
Hajara M LawalDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, DD15EH, Dundee, UK.
Angelika A NoegelInstitute for Biochemistry I, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ludwig EichingerInstitute for Biochemistry I, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Pauline SchaapDivision of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, DD15EH, Dundee, UK.
Gernot GlöcknerInstitute for Biochemistry I, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. gernot.gloeckner@uni-koeln.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe developmental cycle of Dictyostelid amoebae represents an early form of multicellularity with cell type differentiation. Mutant studies in the model Dictyostelium discoideum revealed that its developmental program integrates the actions of genes involved in signal transduction, adhesion, motility, autophagy and cell wall and matrix biosynthesis. However, due to functional redundancy and fail safe options not required in the laboratory, this single organism approach cannot capture all essential genes. To understand how multicellular organisms evolved, it is essential to recognize both the conserved core features of their developmental programs and the gene modifications that instigated phenotypic innovation. For complex organisms, such as animals, this is not within easy reach, but it is feasible for less complex forms, such as the Dictyostelid social amoebas.

resultsWe compared global profiles of gene expression during the development of four social amoebae species that represent 600 mya of Dictyostelia evolution, and identified orthologous conserved genes with similar developmental up-regulation of expression using three different methods. For validation, we disrupted five genes of this core set and examined the phenotypic consequences.

conclusionAt least 71 of the developmentally regulated genes that were identified with all methods were likely to be already present in the last ancestor of all Dictyostelia. The lack of phenotypic changes in null mutants indicates that even highly conserved genes either participate in functionally redundant pathways or are necessary for developmental progression under adverse, non-standard laboratory conditions. Both mechanisms provide robustness to the developmental program, but impose a limit on the information that can be obtained from deleting single genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene ExpressionAmoebaConserved SequenceGene Expression ProfilingGene Knockout TechniquesGene OntologyGenomeMutationPhylogenyDevelopmental genesDevelopmental programDictyosteliaEvolutionExpression pattern conservationMulticellularity

Identifiers

PMID27814692
PMCPMC5097433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.