Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27814375›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Promoting Help-Seeking in Response to Symptoms amongst Primary Care Patients at High Risk of Lung Cancer: A Mixed Method Study.

Richard Wagland, Lucy Brindle, Sean Ewings, Elizabeth James, Mike Moore, Carol Rivas, Ana Ibanez Esqueda, Jessica Corner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Factors influencing symptom appraisal and help-seeking of older adults with possible cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Presentation of lung cancer in primary care.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Oncology letters · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Richard WaglandFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-7587
Lucy BrindleFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Sean EwingsSouthampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, Faculty of Social, Human and Mathematical Sciences, Highfield, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth JamesFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Mike MooreFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Carol RivasFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Ana Ibanez EsquedaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.
Jessica CornerExecutive Office, The Nottingham University, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/156/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer symptoms are vague and difficult to detect. Interventions are needed to promote early diagnosis, however health services are already pressurised. This study explored symptomology and help-seeking behaviours of primary care patients at 'high-risk' of lung cancer (≥50 years old, recent smoking history), to inform targeted interventions.

methodsMixed method study with patients at eight general practitioner (GP) practices across south England. Study incorporated: postal symptom questionnaire; clinical records review of participant consultation behaviour 12 months pre- and post-questionnaire; qualitative participant interviews (n = 38) with a purposive sample.

resultsA small, clinically relevant group (n = 61/908, 6.7%) of primary care patients was identified who, despite reporting potential symptoms of lung cancer in questionnaires, had not consulted a GP ≥12 months. Of nine symptoms associated with lung cancer, 53.4% (629/1172) of total respondents reported ≥1, and 35% (411/1172) reported ≥2. Most participants (77.3%, n = 686/908) had comorbid conditions; 47.8%, (n = 414/908) associated with chest and respiratory symptoms. Participant consulting behaviour significantly increased in the 3-month period following questionnaire completion compared with the previous 3-month period (p = .002), indicating questionnaires impacted upon consulting behaviour. Symptomatic non-consulters were predominantly younger, employed, with higher multiple deprivation scores than their GP practice mean. Of symptomatic non-consulters, 30% (18/61) consulted ≤1 month post-questionnaire, with comorbidities subsequently diagnosed for five participants. Interviews (n = 39) indicated three overarching differences between the views of consulting and non-consulting participants: concern over wasting their own as well as GP time; high tolerance threshold for symptoms; a greater tendency to self-manage symptoms.

conclusionsThis first study to examine symptoms and consulting behaviour amongst a primary care population at 'high- risk' of lung cancer, found symptomatic patients who rarely consult GPs, might respond to a targeted symptom elicitation intervention. Such GP-based interventions may promote early diagnosis of lung cancer or other comorbidities, without burdening already pressurised services.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityEnglandFemaleHelp-Seeking BehaviorHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSelf CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27814375
PMCPMC5096702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.