Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27814364›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Deep Learning Automates the Quantitative Analysis of Individual Cells in Live-Cell Imaging Experiments.

David A Van Valen, Takamasa Kudo, Keara M Lane, Derek N Macklin, Nicolas T Quach, Mialy M DeFelice, Inbal Maayan, Yu Tanouchi, Euan A Ashley, Markus W Covert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 263 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
263citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
67.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

263 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 639 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Multi-region sampling of the human small intestine using an ingestible device.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Proceedings of the ... AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. TNF-⍺-mediated myeloid-instructed CD14Cell reports. Medicine · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

203 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David A Van ValenDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Takamasa KudoDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9709-5549
Keara M LaneDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Derek N MacklinDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-0315
Nicolas T QuachDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Mialy M DeFeliceDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-6292
Inbal MaayanDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Yu TanouchiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6039-748X
Euan A AshleyDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-9577
Markus W CovertDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5993-8912
Stanford University · US

Funding

TRAINING & OUTREACH COREP50GM107615 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FERRELL, JAMES E. · 2013 to 2017
$10.9M
Understanding host-virus interactions at the single cell levelF32GM119319 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI VAN VALEN, DAVID A · 2016 to 2017
$127k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM119319NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Live-cell imaging has opened an exciting window into the role cellular heterogeneity plays in dynamic, living systems. A major critical challenge for this class of experiments is the problem of image segmentation, or determining which parts of a microscope image correspond to which individual cells. Current approaches require many hours of manual curation and depend on approaches that are difficult to share between labs. They are also unable to robustly segment the cytoplasms of mammalian cells. Here, we show that deep convolutional neural networks, a supervised machine learning method, can solve this challenge for multiple cell types across the domains of life. We demonstrate that this approach can robustly segment fluorescent images of cell nuclei as well as phase images of the cytoplasms of individual bacterial and mammalian cells from phase contrast images without the need for a fluorescent cytoplasmic marker. These networks also enable the simultaneous segmentation and identification of different mammalian cell types grown in co-culture. A quantitative comparison with prior methods demonstrates that convolutional neural networks have improved accuracy and lead to a significant reduction in curation time. We relay our experience in designing and optimizing deep convolutional neural networks for this task and outline several design rules that we found led to robust performance. We conclude that deep convolutional neural networks are an accurate method that require less curation time, are generalizable to a multiplicity of cell types, from bacteria to mammalian cells, and expand live-cell imaging capabilities to include multi-cell type systems.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerCell TrackingImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIntravital MicroscopyPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID27814364
PMCPMC5096676
OpenAlexW2548342201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.