Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27814275›Full record

ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2017

Detection of bladder cancer in urine sediments by a hypermethylation panel of selected tumor suppressor genes.

Michaƚ Pietrusiński, Ƚukasz Kȩpczyński, Adam Jȩdrzejczyk, Edyta Borkowska, Magdalena Traczyk-Borszyńska, Maria Constantinou, Bogdan Kaƚużewski, Maciej Borowiec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RASSF1A and its epigenetic dysregulation in genitourinary cancer: a current update.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Novel Bladder Cancer Diagnostic and Surveillance Biomarkers-What Should a Urologist Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tumoral markers in bladder cancer (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michaƚ PietrusińskiDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Ƚukasz KȩpczyńskiDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Adam JȩdrzejczykDepartment of Urology, John Paul II Regional Hospital Beƚchatów, Beƚchatów, Poland.
Edyta BorkowskaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Magdalena Traczyk-BorszyńskaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Maria ConstantinouDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Bogdan KaƚużewskiDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Maciej BorowiecDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Medical University of Lodz · PLJohn Paul II Hospital · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPromoter hypermethylation can be a useful biomarker for early detection and prognosis of bladder cancer, monitoring response to treatment and complement classical diagnostic procedures.

objectiveThe molecular test was performed on DNA from bladder cancer cells in voided urine samples, tumor tissue DNA and normal control DNAs. We aimed to assess the diagnostic potential of epigenetic changes in urine DNA from bladder cancer cases at various clinico-pathological stages of the disease.

methodsThe methylation status of 5 genes (p14ARF, p16INK4A, RASSF1A, DAPK, APC) in 113 tumor samples paired with voided urine specimens was analyzed by MSP. We compared the results of methylation analysis with UroVysion test.

resultsThe methylation profile in tumor/urine DNA was significantly correlated (p ≤ 0,05) with tumor grade in p14ARF, RASSF1a, APC/p14ARF, APC genes, respectively and with stage in p14ARF, RASSF1a/p14ARF genes, respectively. The results of UroVysion test were in correlation with hypermethylation both in tumor and urine DNA in p14ARF, RASSF1a and APC genes (p = 0,008; 0,02 and 0,04, respectively).

conclusionsPromoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes is a frequent mechanism in bladder cancer. We found promoter hypermethylation in all grades and stages of all cases examined. Methylation profile of selected suppressor genes may be a potential useful biomarker and enhance early detection of bladder cancer using a noninvasive urine test.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGenes, Tumor SuppressorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBladder cancercancer epigeneticsDNA methylation

Identifiers

PMID27814275
PMCPMC13020615
OpenAlexW2547792410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.